Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Specter: Jack Kemp's Death May Have Been Caused By GOP Priorities

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:54 AM
Original message
Specter: Jack Kemp's Death May Have Been Caused By GOP Priorities
:wow:

Specter: Jack Kemp's Death May Have Been Caused By GOP Priorities

Huffington Post | Katharine Zaleski | 05/ 4/09 09:57 AM


Sen. Arlen Specter went on CBS News' "Face The Nation" with Bob Schieffer on Sunday to discuss his recent switch to the Democratic Party.

Asked whether he believed that he had let people down by changing parties, Specter said issues like Republican attitudes towards cancer research had made him unhappy with the party. Specter went on to suggest that if Republicans had been more aggressive about cancer research, GOP luminary Jack Kemp would be alive today. The former GOP Congressman and vice-presidential nominee died over the weekend, at age 73, from cancer.

Watch Specter talk about Kemp in the interview below and read a partial transcript underneath. The question begins about seven minutes and thirty-five seconds into the interview:

more...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/04/specter-jack-kemps-death_n_195584.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Jack Kemp was 73.
I don't mean to be callous, and Specter certainly does have a point about the GOP and cancer research, but it's very, very difficult to gripe about living to 73.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Really? in this day and age many people who are 73 are healthy and vital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. 74 is life expectancy. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. 73 is not old!
My parents are both 79 and going strong. They drive places, go shopping, go on vacations, walk the dog, have a beautiful garden. Heck I'm 55 and I suppose I'm living on borrowed time according to your logic. I bet your very young.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Life expectancy in the U.S. for males is 74.
My logic is not in any way, shape, or form flawed. I understand your desire to have what is considered "old" to be a moving goalpost of sorts, but if 1 year below life expectancy is not considered "old", I don't know what is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. take a look at this life table


Life Expectancy is affected by things such as infant mortality. For people in Classical Greece the after life expectancy was about age 30, but that doesn't mean that 30 was old even back then. People lived to ripe old ages like they do today....just less did, and ALOT more died early.

If you reach age 65 in this country you're expected to live into your mid 80's. Every year you go it extends upwards till you get into the 90's. The "Expectation of Life at Age X" for 65 is 83.5 years old. At 67 it's almost 85 years old. Etc. Essentially it's a moving Life Expectancy.

So for people that turned 65 say, when Jack Kemp did, more than half are still alive, and it will still be about 10 years before we reach that point.

So while I would indeed call 73 old, it's a good decade or more of life he could have led but didn't thanks to cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. There's still absolutely no way I would consider him "cheated".
And while I wouldn't exactly say he was living on borrowed time or anything, 73 years is a very full life. The message just simply does not resonate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. If one looks at numbers...
"but it's very, very difficult to gripe about living to 73."

If one looks at numbers rather than faces, I imagine it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. If one looks at anything.
People need to start considering themselves lucky for the time they have on this earth, rather than feeling cheated when they don't hit an artificial and ever expanding concept of what it means to be young or old. 73 is a good, long life by any stretch of the imagination.

Everyone should be so lucky to pass 70. That has nothing to do with either faces or statistics, and one should not fear their own mortality so greatly that they forget to feel lucky that they are alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I imagine many people adhere to your opinion.
I imagine many people adhere to your opinion. I'm not among that number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I don't fear my own mortality.
I've already lived 38 years longer than one of my first boyfriends and his two friends. I think of that often. I wouldn't feel cheated if I died tomorrow. I've lived a good life and I have have done good thing's. But also 73 is not old. When you are older you will understand a bit better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. If your age is one year less than life expectancy - you are old.
Otherwise, there literally would not be a definition of being old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. And according to you
when we reach old age we just roll over and expect to die. I hope I'm around when you get 'old'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Did I say or even imply that?
No, so stop being obtuse. I only said that one has lived a full life, not that they should immediately give up on everything once they hit a certain age. How utterly ridiculous of you to even suggest otherwise.

If you disagree with my definition of old, let's see you put one out there. What is "old" in very real terms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Yeah you did.
You wrote the following;

"I don't mean to be callous, and Specter certainly does have a point about the GOP and cancer research, but it's very, very difficult to gripe about living to 73".

I read this to mean 'Hey gramps your lucky to have lived 73 years so don't gripe about kicking the bucket now. Quit yer bitching and die because your already over stayed your welcome, not to mention going over the average human lifespan".

Clear enough for you? My definition of 'old' is you. Your getting old!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. YOU read it to mean that.
That's YOUR problem, not mine. Sounds like your prejudices are getting the best of you, because I said ONLY what I said and nothing more.

And yes, I am getting old. We all are, Einstein. And it's "you're". Watch out, that senility will get ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Showing your true colours now.
Your are REALLY going to hate yourself more when you get old. I have no prejudices, so you are not making any sense again. At least you can blame a typo on my advanced years, or senility as you put it. What can you blame your stupidly on?

Hey I hear the ice cream truck coming, so why don't you get yourself a treat and get the fuck off my lawn. Bloody kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. You apparently lost your sense of humor, too. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Funny that. As Republicans grow older, they approve of the government's role
in funding pure science...especially on diseases like cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeeHopeWin Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I hate ALL Hypocrites!
A great point...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeeHopeWin Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Anti-science GOP killed Jack Kemp!
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. The GOP is suppressing a cure for cancer?
Kemp was diagnosed in January.

Talk like this is just plain stupid. The only way Kemp would be alive now is if they had a cure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Maybe if we'd had the last 8 years to try to find a cure
(stem cells?), he wouldn't have died. Could be Specter's thinking as he was a big advocate of stem cell research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. A cure for cancer has been in pursuit for more than 8 years
Although I get the stem cell argument, it's ridiculous to argue that one political party's philosophy killed
a cancer victim with 4 month mortality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Hey, I'm not going to defend Specter making sense. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. It's arguable that the GOP's anti-science attitude
in general could have tangentially caused Kemp's death. I think that's more what Specter was getting at.

Under Reagan and both Bushes, the GOP tried every year to dry up NIH funding any way they could. NIH gives out millions each year in research grants to medical schools and research facilities at our colleges and universities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebubula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. Stem Cells...
...you do know that the entire rest of the world has been working on Stem Cell research since before 2000? The stupid US ban did not prohibit private companies from doing research or international entities.

Arguments like this (and John Edwards saying Chris Reeve would walk again if Kerry were elected) are simply wrong. Stem cell research has been going on with vigor worldwide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. Specter was really affected by having cancer himself. I think he is right.
Edited on Tue May-05-09 12:43 PM by Jennicut
There needs to be more devoted to cancer research. Kemp was older but it was the cancer that killed him, not old age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC