Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-07-09 08:18 AM
Original message |
Sessions on now really concerned about how Specter is being treated |
|
for not agreeing with his new party and being stripped of his seniority. This from a member of the original Lockstep Party which has been actively looking for ways to unseat this man. Now, personally, I wish he'd stayed where he was. We don't need him. I just think this is so rich and want to note that the Rs are trying to coax him back, I think.
|
ErinBerin84
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-07-09 08:23 AM
Response to Original message |
|
"Judges who would have......gay tendencies..." Ah yes, the ole "gay tendencies". And when Mike Barnicle was like "WHO on the court are you saying does not care for the rule of law and have an agenda", he said "THE.....the LIBERALS!"
|
Phoebe Loosinhouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-07-09 08:42 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Because this is so different from how he was being treated by his old party |
|
who was going to make sure that he lost in the primary? Specter will look even more ridiculous, if that is possible, if he jumps back.
|
asjr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-07-09 09:01 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Specter already changed the sheets |
|
on his political bed. Is he now asking to be asked to rejoin the Repubs.?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:56 AM
Response to Original message |