US releases Boumediene from Gitmo

[babylonsister]

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_GUANTANAMO_RELEASE?SITE=CONGRA&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

AP source: US releases Boumediene from Gitmo

By NEDRA PICKLER
Associated Press Writer


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States on Friday released the Guantanamo Bay prisoner who was at the center of a Supreme Court battle giving detainees the right to challenge their confinement, an Obama administration official said.

Lakhdar Boumediene left the U.S. naval facility in Cuba Friday headed to relatives in France, said the official, who spoke on a condition of anonymity because the release was not yet cleared for announcement.

Boumediene was arrested along with five other Algerians in 2001 in Bosnia, suspected in a bomb plot against the U.S. embassy in Sarajevo. He arrived in Guantanamo in January 2002.

President Barack Obama has promised to close the prison at Guantanamo and has urged allies to help take prisoners from there. France promised to take one Guantanamo prisoner when Obama attended the NATO summit in April and said last week it would accept Boumediene.

In June 2008, the Supreme Court ruled in a case called Boumediene v. Bush that foreign Guantanamo Bay detainees have rights under the Constitution to challenge their detention in civilian courts. On a 5-4 split, the majority said the U.S. government was violating the rights of prisoners there and that the system the Bush administration put in place to classify suspects as enemy combatants and review those decisions is inadequate.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the court, said, "The laws and Constitution are designed to survive, and remain in force, in extraordinary times."

Boumediene was released as Obama announced that he is reviving Bush-era military tribunals for a small number of Guantanamo detainees, with several new legal protections for terror suspects. The system is expected to try fewer than 20 of the 241 detainees now being held at the detention center.

[Solly Mack]

1. K&R

[ThomCat]

2. The big question is why can't those 20 be tried in a real court?

Is it because any real court would immediately throw out all the evidence that came from torturing them?

Is it because any real court would immediately grant them adequate access to their defense attorneys?

Is it because any real court would be listening to defense attorney complaints that everything they do is spied upon and under the eyes and ears of the prosecution, denying them the ability to form a defense?

There have been so many known and documented problems with the way tribunal cases were going that it no wonder that the worst cases CAN'T be prosecuted in a real court. But it's really disheartening to see a Democratic president going along with this and rigging the rule of law. :(

When all the information finally comes out it isn't going to be pretty.