MzNov
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-16-09 10:06 PM
Original message |
Even With Obama in Charge, Anti-War Democrats Powerless |
|
I can remember when just being a Democrat meant you were anti-war. And I can remember when people who were against war were not ridiculously branded "liberals." It's all just slipping away, isn't it? Here's a view from Common Dreams.org http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/05/16-1
|
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-16-09 10:10 PM
Response to Original message |
1. when did being a Democrat EVER mean you were anti-war?? |
MzNov
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-16-09 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-16-09 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
:shrug:
The Democratic party has NEVER been anti-war.
|
scarletwoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-16-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Can you be more specific? I'm almost 60 years old, and aside from us old hippies & "fringe lefties" |
|
Democrats have never been anti-war in my memory.
sw
|
MzNov
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-16-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. they've always been in mine |
|
so I guess it depends what type of drugs we did
the point of the article tho is anti-war Dems in Congress. Just not going to happen
|
Kaleva
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-16-09 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. Many Dems opposed the war to end slavery |
|
Other then that rather sad tongue in cheek example, I can't think of a time when being a Dem meant one opposed war.
|
NowHearThis
(537 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-16-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It "slipped away" a very long time ago. |
|
If you go back and read Obama's statements and speeches, he's doing pretty much what he said he'd do. Bush was such a disappointment that many people didn't really pay close attention to the details of what Obama was saying. I'm not saying that Obama lied. He's too shrewd to do that. I'm saying it was easy to be idealistic about how things would change if he got elected.
|
MzNov
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-16-09 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I listened to every word Obama said in his campaign. |
|
this article is more about the Dems in Congress than Obama.
I know exactly what he said and was under no illustions. Bigger disappointment maybe, but no illusions.
|
Tarheel_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-16-09 11:32 PM
Response to Original message |
8. "Liberals" maybe. But the Democratic Party is not and has never been... |
|
anti-war. Like the president, most of us are anti-"stupid"-war. There's a fissure developing within the Democratic coalition, and like many others, I find myself moving further away from the so-called "liberals". Thankfully, however, their power & influence is pretty much limited to the internet and The Rachel Maddow Show.
A lot of extreme leftist organizations are finding out, the hard way, that their influence & fundraising ability is in serious decline against a hugely popular Democratic president, as it should be.
|
Fumesucker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-17-09 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. Perhaps you can point out the *smart* war in which we now find ourselves engaged? |
|
Apparently some people think it's smart to get involved in a war on the other side of the planet with exquisitely difficult and lengthy supply lines and one in which we are culturally clueless about the motivations of the various sides to the war.
There are a long list of empires which have gone to Afghanistan to die, with the Soviets being only the most recent.
We have already suffered one monstrously horrible episode of blowback for cluelessly dicking around in Afghanistan, the next one could well be worse.
|
Tarheel_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-17-09 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. Oh, I don't know. Perhaps we could store Pakistan's nukes in "Jawjah" so the... |
|
Taliban won't get hold of them? It's okay being all anti-war and idealistic until you find yourself staring down the barrel of a nuclear warhead. I know, in your world, these threats don't exist. But in the real world, there really are bad people, who want to do bad things. Go figure....
|
Fumesucker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-17-09 04:19 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. We are at war in Pakistan? |
|
I did not know that.
/Johnny Carson
The fact you had to get personal with me shows the bankruptcy of your position.
The only thing we are going to accomplish in either Afghanistan or Pakistan is to inflame the population against us, we simply don't have the cultural understanding needed to keep that from happening.
I guess you've missed the threads about "Hunting men for Jesus" regarding our troops proselytizing in Muslim countries?
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-16-09 11:51 PM
Response to Original message |
10. What's the difference between LBJ and Obama? |
|
Exactly. What's the difference?!
He's really flaking out on important war and foreign policy related issues. Weakness, not leadership, and too willing to be manipulated by the military industrial complex.
|
napoleon_in_rags
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-17-09 12:16 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Gotta say, I can remember when being a Dem was pretty much being anti-war. |
|
It was called the Democratic presidential primary, circa 2008 Hillary was busy regretting her Iraq war vote and Obama was basking in popularity from his vote against it. :)
|
Tarheel_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-17-09 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Anti "Iraq" war is not the same as anti-war. But I'm sure you knew that. (nt) |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 04:12 AM
Response to Original message |