Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If we can't get the single payer option - then I want what Congress has for health insurance..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 11:48 PM
Original message
If we can't get the single payer option - then I want what Congress has for health insurance..
We're paying for it - why not get it for us too?!

And Baucus - you're already on notice. You'll either dump the lobbyists and the for-profit insurance assholes and PAY ATTENTION to your constituents OR risk being thrown out at the next election, replaced with a MORE progressive Senator that GETS it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lbrtbell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's telling him!
Hey, Baucus: Work for us, or you're fired!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obliviously Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good thinking!
I like you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, the Public Option
That's what Obama has proposed and what we're going to lose if we don't get focused in a hurry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Of late, Obama has not been pushing the public option very vocally
at his town hall in April he strongly implied it would only be available for those who couldn't get insurance elsewhere because of preexisting conditions. If he only opens it up for those who are already running up bills, he's setting the public option up to fail.

And his meeting with the crooks from the insurance industry this last week and his willingness to trust them to fix the problem was not very encouraging.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. He just did at the Townhall in New Mexico
Of course, you'd have actually had to listen to the words come out of his mouth in order to know he said them because nobody on the right or the left has any political interest in putting it out there.

“If you don’t have health care or you’re highly unsatisfied with your health care, then let’s give you choices, let’s give you options, including a public plan that you could enroll in and sign up for.”


http://www.obama-mamas.com/blog/?p=227
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I heard what he said in New Mexico
I also heard the words coming out of his mouth this week as he gushed over how wonderful it was that the insurance companies had agree to raise costs less over the next 10 years. Without telling us how that was going to happen or how that would help anyone without insurance - but you can always trust the people who caused the problem to fix it.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Right, and instead of Reducing costs, one of the big goals
Edited on Sun May-17-09 12:49 AM by ThomCat
is to decrease the rate of cost increase. In other words, health care still keeps getting more expensive, but it just gets more expensive a bit more slowly than it is now. That is according to the whitehouse website.

How does that help people who already can't afford health care?

We need health care to be MUCH LESS EXPENSIVE. We need it to become AVAILABLE TO EVERYONE. How hard is that to understand? :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. A subsidy for low income people
to pay for a public plan or private plan. That's been the plan for several years. He's talked about cost cutting methods, from computerized records to reducing medical errors that kill a lot of people. The insurance companies have said they would consider removing the pre-existing conditions in exchange for everyone being in the system. This information is out there and some of it is the exact same things that would have to be done to save money under a single payer plan, so it isn't like it's useless drivel.

And frankly, I've come up against just as many incompetent people at the DMV as I have at the clinic. There's no guarantee one system will deliver better health care than the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressIn2008 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. Heh. I like it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
11. See? That's what I've been advocating from the beginning. It's called FEHBP.
Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.

I have it.

It works.

It's not top-dollar expensive private insurance, but it's comprehensive and it gives consumers choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Citizens! We are "citizens" FIRST, not consumers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. People! We are "people" FIRST, not citizens.
Sentient beings! We are "sentient beings" FIRST, not people.

...and on and on and on.


My point WAS that expanding FEHBP to cover everybody would provide comprehensive access to healthcare while also preserving choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. Except that the private insurers providing it won't tolerate everybody getting it
That would include too many sick people for their tastes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC