Hubert Flottz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-03-07 02:03 PM
Original message |
| If Bush does Veto the bill... |
|
The democrats should repeal all the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, to pay for THEIR war.
|
| RC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-03-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Too many dems profited from those tax cuts also.
|
| Hubert Flottz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-03-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 6. It's time for the haves and the have mores to sacrifice something too. |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-03-07 02:14 PM by Hubert Flottz
The super wealthy always duck out on the fighting and their paying for their freedom and liberty.
Edit no other pResident in the history of our country, has given a tax cut in a time of war. Bush has given the richest people in the country, four tax cuts since 9/11!
|
| Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-03-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. I do believe pulling the funds was how they ended the Viet nam war... |
| ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-03-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Yes, if Dimson extends this war, they should repeal these |
|
tax cuts for the wealthy IMMEDIATELY ... and with extreme prejudice. :thumbsup:
Let's contact our respective congress critters and give them A CLUE?
|
| havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-03-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 8. Repeal the cuts AND put in some temporary increases for the top 2% |
|
to re-coup what we lost to them at a time of war.
Giving them a break while borrowing money from China to fight a needless war to further enrich many of the top tier is just plain obscene!
|
| tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-03-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. I like it. The only thing Bush's base loves more than Bush is their money. |
|
Hit them where it hurts the most, right in their fat wallets.
|
| Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-03-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. They should do that anyway. nt |
| bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-03-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 7. They are going to have to do it sooner or later |
|
Though probably by letting the tax cuts expire, I would guess. Bryant Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com |
| jwirr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-03-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Apparently you think that we can do this. What about *ss's veto? |
| Hubert Flottz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-03-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-03-07 02:28 PM by Hubert Flottz
They are less than 500. We are 300 million.
Edit...WE are 298,444,215 (July 2006 est.)
|
| jwirr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-03-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 11. If it is only the House then we can do it. I know that in the past when |
|
we found ourselves in power only in the House we still had the power to stop funding. If so we need to go for it.
|
| damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-03-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. He'd damn-well better! He promised to do it! |
|
That's why it was safe for Dems to vote for more funding for the war.
|
| Hubert Flottz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-03-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 13. I can't ever remember a single time when Bush has told the truth. |
|
Half truths is about as close as he gets.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:19 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
