Cronus Protagonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 01:33 PM
Original message |
Do you agree with the CASC decision? |
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message |
Cronus Protagonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. It was WAY in favor a few minutes ago |
|
And of course, that was what they broadcast on TV (Mormon news announcer)
|
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
10. Mor(m)on TV announcer? Well that explains it. |
|
His 12 wives and 36 kids probably rigged the poll.
|
Cronus Protagonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. More like his thousands of brethren spending the church's money |
|
AND all his wives and kids... lol
|
Cronus Protagonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yes votes still at 55% |
|
You know it's the old folk who don't work skewing this poll.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
hlthe2b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I don't agree with a ban on gay marriage--at all |
|
But this poll is poorly worded if you want to get at that specific aspect.... There are pro-GLBT lawyers who would argue that the "legal" decision was valid, despite deploring the outcome....
|
anigbrowl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. exactly. Legally, it's correct. I just don't like what our state constitution now says. |
rbixby
(716 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Wasn't this about the legal process? |
|
I agree that marriage is something that should be afforded to everyone in a relationship that's defined as legal in the eyes of the law (consenting adults, not related, no your donkey, etc), but I think that this court decision was more about the process of going about making a constitutional amendment than on gay marriage itself. I think the constitutionality of it is something which would need to be decided in a separate case.
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
Cronus Protagonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I hope that means you voted in the poll |
|
They'll have to broadcast the numbers in the early evening news, so lets jack it up!
|
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message |
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 03:08 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 03:50 PM
Response to Original message |