Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CA Governor proposes 100% cut in state funding for AIDS programs -

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:32 PM
Original message
CA Governor proposes 100% cut in state funding for AIDS programs -
Info from Dr. Michelle Roland, Chief of CA Dept of Public Health/Office of AIDS (OA). The Governor's proposal may be a budget bargaining tool, yet deep cuts are expected at OA. This would be the worst case scenario. OA and local AIDS programs are taking this seriously. (notes from a conference call) ~ pinto

The California Legislature has received a second proposal on Thursday afternoon. It differs from a previous proposal published May 21, 2009 by the Governor’s Office.

Thursday’s Proposal Includes:

100% elimination of State General Fund support to all Office of AIDS Programs.

The State's General Fund annually provides funding for:

80% of HIV Education and Prevention programs
76% of HIV Counseling and Testing programs
84.5% of Epidemiology and Surveillance programs
51.2% of Early Intervention programs (EIP)
100% of PCR and Immuno/Phenotype Assays
23% of AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP)
31% of Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA)
54% of Home/Community Based Care

(The balance of funding comes from the federal Ryan White Care Act. That funding could eventually be in jeopardy under a "Maintenance of Effort" requirement for states to receive Ryan White funds.)

If you're a CA resident and have a few minutes, please call your CA State Assembly member on this.
http://www.assembly.ca.gov/defaulttext.asp . Budget hearings are currently underway. ~ pinto

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Has he cut his own salary? With all his millions and continued royalties
not to mention his wife's not exactly broke....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He never accepted a salary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. that is why all goes to charity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He actually gives 100% of his salary to charity
but given that fact, he should get paid one buck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. He could be a man and cut the California National Guard
They'd all come home, we'd have far less money and no where in the 2nd Amendment does it say you HAVE to keep a militia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Can anyone explain, in a nutshell, why CA is in the dumper in the first place?
Aren't taxes collected to run things? It seems like the budget crisis has been going on forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Part of it was passage of prop 13 30 years ago and state voters not wanting to increase any
taxes or fees so now they have to have draconian cuts. I'm glad I don't live in CA anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Agree. I think Prop 13 was the precursor to all of this. It cut basic funding base for locals.
Edited on Thu May-28-09 05:02 PM by pinto
Jarvis and Issa. Effectively dismantling a fine state system, one program/service at a time.

ed for accuracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Federal government has been sucking the teat of Cali
for many years to the tune of $50B/year. That is the true cause of the fiscal crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC