Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Raw Story: Obama is appointing an extreme anti-abortion advocate to Faith-Based

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 02:47 PM
Original message
Raw Story: Obama is appointing an extreme anti-abortion advocate to Faith-Based
whatever it is.

Here is the article on Raw Story:

President Barack Obama has tapped an anti-abortion activist to a senior Health and Human Services "faith-based" position just a week after the murder of prominent abortion doctor George Tiller.

Alexia Kelley is executive director of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good (CACG), and will head the Center for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships at the Department of Health and Human Services.

According to The American Prospect, a liberal magazine, "Kelley is a leading proponent of 'common ground' abortion reduction -- only CACG's common ground is at odds with that of Obama. While the administration favors reducing the need for abortion by reducing unintended pregnancies, Kelley has made clear that she seeks instead to reduce access to abortion."

http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/06/obama-taps-anti-abortion-activist/

I'm a Democrat. I like some of what Obama is doing, but I cannot support the appointment of Ms. Kelley to any post in Obama's government. There are lots of liberals who need jobs, are more competent than this woman could ever be and can do this job. Another very bad day for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. But, see, they'll work hard to reduce the NEED for abortions...uh, and stuff
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hamsterjill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. Yeah, abstinence works, right?
Just ask Bristol Palin!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. More good news.
:banghead:

Is this what bipartisanship means? If so, I think I like it even less than I thought I would when it first came up during the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. GET RID OF FAITH-BASED INITIATIVES NOW
Along with charter schools.

Seriously, did Obama just run on the Democratic ticket as a convenience?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Even though I love Obama, you are dead right about "Faith Based Initiatives."
It makes no sense in a country that claims to value separation of church and state.

Time to get rid of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Agreed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. Agree, his bipartisanship has gone way overboard. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Maybe he's just planted a land mine!
;-) :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. Agree- the existence of this department in government is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. My...Isn't that special
Solly says in her southern accent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Well, bless his li'l ole heart!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. BUt he is so much smarter than us. He must have a master plan to bring us all
together.

Some people might get upset that their little issue is not solved right now - they just have to give our brilliant President a little time.

Don't rain on our parade, you poutagers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Aren't you required to use the sarcasm thingy when you do that? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. you mean
i don't get my pony x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. Perhaps there's a wolf or two
who could demonstrate how to rain on parades. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm posting again because I am that angry
Roseanne said today on Stephanie Miller that Obama and Bush were alike. I wouldn't go that far, but this shit needs to stop now. I'm really sick of the demonization of abortion. I am tired of seeing teenagers drag around babies. It's insane. Legal abortion is the law of the land - and I'm not afraid to say that I think abortion is okay. I don't consider it murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I am livid also
I have supported President Obama since he began running in the primary, now I wonder for the first time if my support was misplaced. This appointment is beyond belief. This is a slap in the face from the President to every secular woman in the country.

I am terribly upset by his appointment of this right-wing tool. He might as well have appointed Sarah Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Stuff like this is why I DIDN'T support Obama in the primary
I did not feel that he was as strong as Hillary on women's issues and I still don't think so. Add to that, she is just enough older than he that she realizes what it was like pre Roe v. Wade. I think there are a lot of people who just have no idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. It won't help
But I emailed through the whitehouse.gov site.

Why does he kiss up to people that were at the Palin rallys shouting for the worst to be done? These people will never be bi-partisan, they will smile at what they are given then take more by force. These kinds of people are monsters that will lie to your face and knife you when you turn around. Bin Laden has nothing on these creeps.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Make that two of us
And so far President Obama has been living down to my expectations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. Well put. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hamsterjill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Well put!
To me, abortion is between a woman and her health care provider and whomever else she chooses to involve in her decision making process.

No woman who decides to have an abortion should be denied the availability of a safe, legal medical procedure. Period.

Likewise, any woman who decides to carry a pregnancy to term should have access to proper medical care, etc. in order that she might make that choice as well.

But we need to get the "religion" aspect out of the right to choose. The anti-choice people have no right to impose their religious beliefs on anyone but themselves. They can exercise their own beliefs by not engaging in behavior that they find intolerable (i.e., they should not have abortions).

But they cannot be allowed to make that choice for those women who desire otherwise.

This appointment has the potential to take us back to the coat hanger days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Awesome
No, unfund the office. Two birds dealth with...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Great
Now, defund the office. Two birds dealth with...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. So? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. You've *got* to be kidding.
"So?"

That's your response?

"So?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark Twain Girl Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why does Health and Human Services have a "faith based" senior position?
Edited on Fri Jun-05-09 03:32 PM by Mark Twain Girl
Or, a position at all?

Edited to add:

Kelley's appointment appears yet more salient in lieu of the fact that President Obama has expanded the faith-based project of the executive branch to include public policy -- with an eye toward reducing the need for abortions.

and to say:

what the hell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Sadly, you'll find faith based initiatives infecting all branches of the government..
Although they are now called the White House Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships.


They are in the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
http://www.hhs.gov/fbci /

And the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
http://www.hud.gov/offices/fbci /

And the U.S. Department of Education
http://www.ed.gov/about/inits/list/fbci/index.html

And the Department of Labor
http://www.dol.gov/cfbci /

And the Department of Agriculture
http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p/_s.7_0_A/7_0_CJ?na...

And the Department of Veterans Affairs
http://www1.va.gov/fbci /

The Justice Department
http://www.usdoj.gov/fbci /

The Small Business Administration
http://www.sba.gov/aboutsba/sbaprograms/faithbased/FBCI...

USAID
http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/global_partnerships/fbci/...

Let's not forget Homeland Security!
http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/structure/editorial_0829.shtm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
37. Embrassez l'infâme?
Edited on Sat Jun-06-09 01:21 PM by Karmadillo
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. Puke
:puke: That's all I want to say on this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Good enough for me. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
28. In the first place-the mere existance of a faith based office is in violation of the Constitution.
Edited on Fri Jun-05-09 05:13 PM by earth mom
So I'm not surprised by this turn of events, not at all.

Disgusted, but not surprised. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreamnightwind Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
30. Yikes! Whaddabout Sotomayor?
Anyone know where she stands on choice? I heard her position is less than clear, though I don't know more than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
34. Read this and hope your head doesn't explode...
« THE CONTROL-F THEORY OF JOURNALISM. | Main | SOMETHING TO CELEBRATE? »
ABORTION FOE TO LEAD HHS FAITH-BASED OFFICE.

President Obama has appointed Alexia Kelley, executive director of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good (CACG), to head the Center for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships at the Department of Health and Human Services. Kelley is a leading proponent of "common ground" abortion reduction -- only CACG's common ground is at odds with that of Obama. While the administration favors reducing the need for abortion by reducing unintended pregnancies, Kelley has made clear that she seeks instead to reduce access to abortion. That is an extremely disturbing development, especially coming this week in the wake of George Tiller's assassination.

Under George W. Bush, the faith-based centers didn't play a policy role. But Obama has expanded the faith-based project to include a policy side, and one of its chief goals is to reduce the need for abortion. I have opposed this, because reproductive health is a public health, not a religious issue. Also problematic: It is counterproductive for Obama to appoint someone who disagrees with the administration's stance. Obama finds himself now in the difficult position of having elevated the importance of religion to making policy, and having appointed a religious figure whose opinions on policy conflict with his.

Kelley and CACG have made clear they are committed to Catholic doctrine on abortion and birth control. CACG has supported the Pregnant Women's Support Act, aimed at stigmatizing abortion and making it less accessible. In discussing legislation on reducing the need for abortion, Kelley has written that various pieces of legislation concerned with women's health "are not all perfect; some include contraception -- which the Church opposes." Never mind that more than 90 percent of American Catholics use it anyway.

http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=06&year=2009&base_name=abortion_foe_to_lead_hhs_faith
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
35. Picture thread! Stat! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
36. There is nothing extreme about Alexia Kelley. She does not
favor repealing Roe V Wade. She has never advocated for legislation limiting abortion. She has been outspoken in favor of social programs that ease the financial burdens on young mothers such as fully funding WIC. Kelley has never demonstrated against abortion though she has participated in many anti-death penalty actions.

Many Catholics for Choice are members of CACG which has been criticized by a number of bishops for not taking a hard anti-abortion stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. AHEM!
Kelley and CACG have made clear they are committed to Catholic doctrine on abortion and birth control. CACG has supported the Pregnant Women's Support Act, aimed at stigmatizing abortion and making it less accessible. In discussing legislation on reducing the need for abortion, Kelley has written that various pieces of legislation concerned with women's health "are not all perfect; some include contraception -- which the Church opposes." Never mind that more than 90 percent of American Catholics use it anyway.

http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC