malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-15-09 01:55 PM
Original message |
|
Do not fucking apologize.
That is all.
|
dem629
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-15-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It's the way we operate now. Someone is "offended" and the speaker gives a forced apology. |
|
Edited on Mon Jun-15-09 01:56 PM by dem629
And somehow the "offended" like to receive forced apologies.
Speech Police 101.
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-15-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It's a Clinton White House thing |
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-15-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
Parker CA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-15-09 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Unfortunately, the CIA is alread walking back the comments. The good thing is that the comments |
|
were made and the idea has been thrown into the national dialogue. Panetta was 100% correct, and even if the comments are walked back a bit, the idea is now being discussed.
|
bertman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-15-09 02:20 PM
Response to Original message |
5. It's a "liberal" Democrat thing. When was the last time a Republican backed down from |
|
anything offensive he or she said--unless it was about Rush Limbaugh?
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-15-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. My point precisely n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:02 PM
Response to Original message |