Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Customs And Border Protection Proposal Could Ban Many Pocketknives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 11:53 PM
Original message
Customs And Border Protection Proposal Could Ban Many Pocketknives
Edited on Tue Jun-16-09 12:02 AM by Subdivisions

http://www.ammoland.com/2009/06/13/customs-and-border-protection-proposal-could-ban-many-pocketknives/

Washington, DC - -(AmmoLand.com)- U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has issued a proposed rule change that directly targets the importation of “assisted opening” folding knives. (Read the proposed rule here.)

The proposed regulations would designate all these knives as “switchblades” (despite the fact they do not fall under the federal definition of “switchblades”), and would make them illegal for import into the United States.

The proposed rule could affect all knives that can be opened with one hand, because it also includes changes in the interpretation of “gravity and inertia” opening knives in a way that could outlaw all knives that can be opened with a single hand.

This means the new regulation could ban the importation of most of the pocketknives that are now in popular use.

...





http://www.akti.org/

Customs' proposal will make criminals of 35.6 million Americans

The definition of a switchblade or automatic knife has been clear and explicit in federal law
since 1958. There have been several state court cases in California, Texas, Illiinois and
Michigan on the issue of assisted-opening knives. Every judge in every case has ruled they are
not switchblades because they do not possess an activating button on the handle.

In fact, AKTI' s bill on the Texas governor's desk now clarified their statute, reaffirming the 50-
year old federal definition, and clearly distinguishing one-hand openers and assisted-openers
from knives classified as switchblades or automatics.

Be warned … AKTI fears that all folding knives will be at risk. U.S. Customs’ proposal indicates
it is directed at only the importers of assisted-opening knives. However, the language used in
their revocation document is so broad and uses virtually every term ever applied to any knife that
opens with one hand. We fear that they are attempting to bypass the will of Congress and that
once they succeed in getting assisted-openers defined as switchblades, they could move
against all folding knives. These include multi-tools, traditional pocket knives, one-hand
openers, and assisted-openers.

If you want to view a video of what AKTI fears about this situation and about your being branded
a criminal if you carry a folding knife, go to … http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5KINtCajwI

...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, sensible restrictions on deadly weapons is EXACTLY like the Holocaust.
:eyes:


I really think we need to extend Godwin's law to the Niemöller poem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. first, they came for the bullshit analogies...
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. snrk
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cslinger59 Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Dude I think this knife restriction thing is stupid as hell but........
That was hilarious funny. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. What are you talking about? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I'm talking about your "first they came for the knives" bullshit
Nice edit, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. My bad. I hit the post message button before I put a title on the post. I
quickly put something and then I realized my mistake. So, I changed it to the title of one of the articles cited. I'm merely posting this for any DUers who might have these knives. My intention was not to offend. I was not aware of the context of that particular refrain. I've since looked it up and can see that the reaction to it was fair. So, I changed it. My humble apologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Fair enough.
My reaction was based on the number of times that poem is used on DU for completely frivolous reasons. And the fact that any weapons restriction in the US is invariably compared to Nazi Germany.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. That was not my intention. Again, I apologize for any confusion. My quick
and unthinking (I've got ten things going on here) choice of that phrase was most probably an affect of the frivolous use of it elsewhere here as I know I've seen it. In the process, I used it frivolously. But I have gone, using the references above, and looked it up. I'm now educated on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. OK, stop apologizing ;)
Funny thing, you're the first person to post something dumb on DU.

Personally, I know I've never done it.


(Yes, :sarcasm:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. yes it is. it is misused about as much as the
"you can't yell fire in a crowded theater" meme, which is missapplied, misunderstood, and usually illogically used.

(for the record, you can't FALSELY yell fire, the quote is from a court case using that term to justify prosecuting somebody for WAR PROTESTING, and it was from a case that was superseded by later case law that established a very strict standard regarding imminence, etc.)

drives me nuts

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
National Steel 27 Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is crap. As a practice of my trade....
I need to be able to hold an object (say, let's call it a "plant") with one hand and open a knife with the other hand.

I have spent a lot of money on my knives and I do not intend to stop using them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. oh, for chrissakes. what idiotic fearmongering bullshit.
Edited on Tue Jun-16-09 12:04 AM by enki23
it may or may not be a stupid idea to fuck with the importation of easy-opening pocketknives. but the supposed slippery-slope here is just absurd. anyone who thinks customs is going to hunt them down and take away their pocketknives is way, way beyond mere paranoia.

i mean, gosh. while we're at it here... i heard those extra numbers you sometimes see on street and highway signs are markings to show the UN troops which way to go when they invade. also, your digital converter box records everything you say. and think. fnord.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. the new "... regulation could ban the importation of most of the pocketknives ..."
Oh no! We'll have to buy Amerocan made knives!!!! :scared:

Why are they equating importing and transporting across state lines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
13. Fuck 'em, they can't have my switchblades...
nor can they have my Russian SKS with the banana clips & bayonette...


Hey, I gotta have *something* to clean my nails with...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armyowalgreens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
14. Misleading title. This will be good for American knife makers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Which will enable a WTO trade restriction suit, which will torpedo the rule.
The Customs office has no authority to ban knives in the U.S., but can merely regulate what is carried into the US. If a border rule permits domestic manufacturers to create and distribute an item while banning foreign manufacturers from creating and distributing the exact same item, that rule would qualify as an unfair restraint on trade and potentially subject the U.S. to a WTO trade suit. Congress isn't going to risk a trade war over pocketknives, and would simply order Customs to permit their importation again.

Any boon for American knife makers would be brief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC