Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NTSB: Train in crash was recommended for phaseout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 09:59 AM
Original message
NTSB: Train in crash was recommended for phaseout

NTSB: Train in crash was recommended for phaseout

By BRIAN WITTE
Associated Press Writer


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The subway train that plowed into another stopped train, killing at least seven people and injuring scores of others in the nation's capital, was part of an aging fleet that federal officials had sought to phase out because of safety concerns, an investigator said Tuesday.

But the Metrorail transit system kept the old trains running despite warnings in 2006, said Debbie Hersman of the National Transportation Safety Board.

The rush-hour crash sent more than 70 people to hospitals. Mayor Adrian Fenty announced Tuesday that seven had died, including the operator of the moving train. Earlier, the District of Columbia Fire Department Web site announced that three bodies had been found in addition to the six fatalities reported Monday.

Fenty said two victims were hospitalized in critical condition.

Hersman said investigators expect to recover recorders from the train that was struck. The train that triggered the collision was part of an old fleet that was not equipped with the devices, which can provide valuable information to determine why the crash occurred, Hersman said.

more...

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DC_METRO_TRAIN_DERAILMENT?SITE=CONGRA&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks, Bush! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Towlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. I didn't figure it would be the train's fault. I expect it to be traffic control or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
konnichi wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Damn trains, just like guns - they get a wild hair and start offing people all on their own.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. We Were Just In D.C. Last Week And Rode The Metro ........
I'm in D.C. every year about this time at a meeting. We taken the Metro all over the D.C. Metropolitan area - but this year it felt different. Instead of its usual fine tuned ride - we were always stopping in the tunnel and had many delays. One person in our party indicated that she was very uncomfortable riding - as she sensed something might be wrong with the system.

Much to our surprise - just one week later - this crash.

Aging problems with the system/trains appears to be the cause.

Look for more of this type of accident/tragedy to happen all over the country as the infrastructure that we all rely on daily begins to deteriorate and there is no monies in the system to provide preventative maintenance, repair and replace.

As municipalities struggle to eke by financially - more and more of this type of calamity will be occurring because all kinds of cuts are being made.

Our public health is being endangered every day because of the same circumstances impacting on all sorts of public utilities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Aging infrastructure is one possibility.
But even if this is true, some sort of human failure is very likely to have contributed. I takes multiple failures (or interventions) in multiple systems to create a "runaway" train.

Accidents of this nature sometimes occur as a result of drivers relying on safety equipment, such as automatic brake trips at red signals, to keep them from making mistakes. Train drivers are notorious for doing things that take part of their attention away from the job they are supposed to be doing, such as reading while the train is in motion.

Another not uncommon practice is for drivers to overide deadman switches, because they find them "anoying".

Pure mechanical failure is a possibility, but there is a very good chance that some sort of human factor was involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cagesoulman Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The NTSB has not mentioned human failure at all.
I don't think this lady did it. The NTSB is really ticked about the old trains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Trains don't just plough full speed into the backs of other trains for no reason.
Other avenues for human failure exist. Poor maintenance; Lack of maintenance; a dsescision not to retrofit newer safety devices to aging rolling stock that is earmarked for scrapping (one day soon); incorrectly set points; incorrect signal; even deliberate sabotage.

Unfortunately, drivers tend to come in for their share of the bad press, because there is all too often something they could have done to lessen the impact of an accident such as this one. OR something they did, or failed to do, made the accident inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Just read WHY the NTSB is ticked about the older trains.
The older trains are structurally unsound, which causes accidents when they occur to be far more catastrophic than they might otherwise be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Transit should be self-supporting." Fuck that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC