BuyingThyme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-24-09 03:53 PM
Original message |
Being a terrorist Islamic state and all, why do Pukes have a problem with the violence in Iran? |
|
I mean, these fuckers spend so much time complaining about Obama's gestures aimed at opening lines of communication and all, preferring to "nuke" Iran over talking things out, so how is it that these same fuckers can possibly give a flying fuck about what's going on over there now?
If I didn't know better I'd think they're full of shit.
It's so weird.
|
HarvardMed
(46 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-24-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It's a simple set of formulas that they follow |
|
To them:
1- Meddling with Iran's day to day affairs is just as good as nuking them - as long as it's Ahamdinejad's government 2- Iran is an enemy as long as it's controlled by Khamenei 3- Any country with oil should be blamed for having WMDs
Formulas are subject to change and/or exceptions may apply.
|
BuyingThyme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-24-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Welcome to DU, HarvardMed! |
Kickin_Donkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-24-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I think it's simpler than that: |
|
Whatever Obama does -- in this case taking a low-key, wait-and-see approach -- the Pukes reflexively take the opposite stance so they can slam him.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message |