Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF! NOW Sanford is going to worry about jobs?????????????

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:03 AM
Original message
WTF! NOW Sanford is going to worry about jobs?????????????
<snip>
But Sanford allies like John Rainey, the state’s chief economic adviser who encouraged Sanford to run for governor in 2002, said he dined with Sanford on Sunday and encouraged the governor to stay on.

“The state would lose momentum. A change in administration would take months to adjust to,” Rainey said. “I said (to him) ‘You must stay. It is your duty to stay.’”

Rainey said Sanford now must focus on job creation. South Carolina ranks third in unemployment with 266,000 jobless workers.

“We’ve got people underemployed and unemployed. We’ve got (food banks) with empty pantries,” Rainey said. “We are in the vortex of an economic storm. Things are going to get worse before they get better. The state’s success is tied to (Sanford’s) success.”
<snip>
http://www.thestate.com/local/story/846576.html

That asshole has done NOTHING to bring jobs to this state. He hasn't done anything about retraining people for new types of jobs.

He's worked hard at 2 things. Dismantling the public school system and not accepting the stimulus money that we so badly needed.

Unfortunately the state's success has been tied to him, and it's been all down hill. It's time to cut him loose and set the effing state free. He's done enough thankyouverymuch.

I hope he sticks a roman candle up his pious tight ass and flies to the moon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bill Clinton, will you please go after this guy the way he went after you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think he's sincerly worried about job loss - one job in particular admittedly
The prospect of unemployment does tend to focus the mind.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. I heard one comment he made over the weekend where he said
he was going to try to work WITH the State legislators because the past few years have been very difficult.

I still think he should resign...not because of his affair...but for total irresponsibility when he abandoned the State and all his duties for 5 days and wwas unreachable! Anyone in any job, no ,atter what position it was, would have been terminated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That was the funniest thing he has ever said.
Sanford has done everything in his power NOT to work with the legislature - and the majority of them are Rethugs.

In 2006, he targeted some of them and supported other Rethugs.
Secret Proposal Aims to Defeat Anti-Sanford Lawmakers
http://www.free-times.com/index.php?cat=1992912064227409&ShowArticle_ID=11462201080760466

They'd rather work with the Devil himself. All that has gone on in the last few years has been monkey business. Sanford and the legislature fling poo back and forth at each other.

PS - The reason Lindsey Graham is backing Sanford is because he and the Gov of Love made a deal. Sanford agreed not to run agains Graham in his 2008 bid for relection to the Senate. I'm not sure what Sanford got out of it, but I'm sure we will see. He's getting some of it back now with Graham's support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Can't you find a decennt Dem to run aginst Graham? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Nope

Never seen one in these parts.

They are indistinguishable from Republicans, even more so than the average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. There are a couple of candidates that are not bad.
However, my opinion of the leadership on the party is, shall we say, piss poor. They have their own little patch of turf and they busily protect that. Carol and Don Fowler have run the party forever, and until they go, the party won't function well.
In 2008, the person who ran against Graham was an ex Ron Paul supporter who switched parties. He was a loon who still got 42% of the vote.
Obama's organization is setting up offices in the state thank heavens. Democrats can be elected, but not the way it has been going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is he having a mental breakdown?
This is really erratic behavior from out here in non-South CArolina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I have given that a lot of thought.
Sanford has always been strange. He has never fit in with anybody in the state. He has never been a run of the mill Southern politician.

When this mess began, I really didn't think it was an affair. I know anybody can change, but a lover never entered my mind. The man really fell in love to my astonishment. Sanford went against every moral code he has espoused.

I think he did have some kind of break. He had to be under enormous pressure. He had to handle:
1- A faraway woman who he appeared to have lost his mind over.
2- His own marriage. There was never a peep about any trouble.
3- His 4 sons. Although he has treated them like crap in this mess, I think in his warped way he really does love them.
4- His moral and political ideology had split him into 2 pieces. On one side he was going against everything he believed in, and on the other he was holding tightly to his political beliefs.
5- somewhere in this he is supposed to be governing a state.

I think he snapped in some way, and I don't think he's right yet. He's in Sanfordworld now where everyhting is going to be okay. He's juuuuuuust like King David.

As Uecker said, "Juuuuuuuust a bit outside."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. When he works on holding onto jobs other than his own,
pigs will fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. That would mean that
almost the whole state legislature would take wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. "... Sanford now must focus on job creation"
He's doing his part for steady employment of divorce lawyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC