Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An ambitious attempt to create the Department of Pat Robertson's Justice and a theocracy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 11:51 AM
Original message
An ambitious attempt to create the Department of Pat Robertson's Justice and a theocracy
Edited on Mon Apr-09-07 12:18 PM by ProSense

Is Pat Robertson’s law school changing America?

One of the problems with public perceptions about crazed TV preacher Pat Robertson is that most perceive him as just a crazed TV preacher. He’ll go on his crazed daily television show (The 700 Club), offer crazed commentary just about everything, and then make crazed rationalizations for his lunacy. The media marvels at his madness, but generally overlooks the bigger problem: Robertson laid out an ambitious agenda years ago, and he’s succeeding.

Thanks to the prosecutor purge scandal, and former Alberto Gonzales aide Monica Goodling’s role in it, the public is learning about Robertson’s Regent University, which, as Slate’s Dahlia Lithwick noted over the weekend, is doing exactly what it set out to do.

Goodling is only one of 150 graduates of Regent University currently serving in this administration, as Regent’s Web site proclaims proudly, a huge number for a 29-year-old school. Regent estimates that “approximately one out of every six Regent alumni is employed in some form of government work.” And that’s precisely what its founder desired. The school’s motto is “Christian Leadership To Change the World,” and the world seems to be changing apace. Former Attorney General John Ashcroft teaches at Regent, and graduates have achieved senior positions in the Bush administration. The express goal is not only to tear down the wall between church and state in America (a “lie of the left,” according to Robertson) but also to enmesh the two.

The law school’s dean, Jeffrey A. Brauch, urges in his “vision” statement that students reflect upon “the critical role the Christian faith should play in our legal system.” Jason Eige (’99), senior assistant to Virginia Attorney General Bob McDonnell, puts it pithily in the alumni newsletter, Regent Remark: “Your Resume Is God’s Instrument.”

As Christopher Hayes explained in The American Prospect, more than two-thirds of Regent students identified themselves as Republicans, but the numbers aren’t as important as the school’s mission. As Hayes noted, “what students are taught at a place like Regent, or even Calvin and Wheaton, is to live out a Christ-centered existence in all facets of their lives. But what they learn is to become Republicans.”

<...>

Thanks to Robertson’s minions infiltrating Bush’s Justice Department, religious right activists are literally helping drive federal law enforcement, particularly when it comes to civil rights and picking U.S. Attorneys.

more


Edited to add:

I am also not claiming that a full blown theocratic dystopia a la The Handmaid's Tale is likely in America's future. However, the theocrats have managed to undermine the separation of church and state in numerous different ways. Many of the goals of the theocrats, which were considered utterly crackpot, are now considered fit for mainstream discussion. Some examples include the establishment of an office of "faith-based initiatives," the utterly substance-less "intelligent design" creationism, the advocacy of a minimalist federal government, the opposition to the U.N. and multi-lateralism, the establishment of a false dichotomy between a dominant "secularism" and a persecuted Christianity, the attempt to undermine and eliminate Social Security, and the placement within the American government, at all levels, of political operatives fully committed to destroying American liberalism.

By "American liberalism" I am not referring specifically to those of us who call ourselves "liberals" but something far broader. The goal of the theocrats is to replace the Englightenment liberal idea of a nation of laws and the consensus of the governed with a government of self-described superior beings who claim they derive their power directly from God.

Such claims immunize rulers from criticism or accountability from the people. Such claims are made, in many different ways, by the Bush administration. Only Bush, of all presidents, at least in recent history, has explicitly claimed that the reason he took the country to war was because God told him to. Furthermore, Bush has never discouraged his far right base from claiming he is God's avatar on earth. (If anyone doubts this, I'll gladly provide links.) But sometimes the claim that "God commands it" is minimized or simply assumed, in the theocrats' support of such far-right goals as the elimination of Social Security, income tax, or participation in the UN.

These are extremely dangerous trends. Due to a highly sophisticated public relations campaign, the extent of christianist undermining both of American civic values AND the very infrastructure of American government (as with Goodling) has been grossly underestimated by the mainstream.

Why should we worry? Well, when you have an American president who follows God's will rather than the will of the people, you end up quagmired in insane, immoral wars as in Iraq. You end with an erosion of scientific expertise. And you end up with a federal government which holds itself accountable to no earthly law or lawmaker.In short, you end up with precisely the situation we face today with the Bush administration and, at the local level, with christianist incursions into state, county, and city government.

That's for starters. As bad as Bush is, if the theocrats aren't beaten back to the fringes of American politics, it will get a lot worse.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. There are a number of nominally religious universities
Edited on Mon Apr-09-07 11:58 AM by Orrex
Whose primary goal is to instruct students in ways to undermine and attack rational discourse and intellectualism.

Robertson is a blight on humanity, and sadly he's far from alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. his graduates are at every level of government in many states
and most people don't realize it. Virginia celebrated getting a governor who was democrat in last election while the next in line is one of pat robertson soliders of insanity - the second in command voted in -

They are on all the school boards and in many other areas of government in the hampton roads area
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Regent University path to accreditation

ABA GRANTS ACCREDITATION TO REGENT LAW SCHOOL

WHAT IT MEANS: It will be easier for Regent to attract top students and faculty. Regent graduates can take the bar exam in all 50 states. It is a seal of approval from the nation's legal establishment.

After 10 years of trying, Pat Robertson's law school finally won some respect Tuesday from the nation's legal establishment.

The American Bar Association granted full accreditation Tuesday to the Regent University School of Law. The vote came in Orlando at an annual meeting of the bar's House of Delegates.

The action culminates a 10-year struggle for recognition at the Bible-based school. It comes exactly one decade after the first students enrolled there, seeking an education based on God's word as much as man's.

<...>

In 1993, the law school plunged into the worst crisis in its short life when Regent directors fired then-dean Titus, saying he was too extreme. Students and faculty revolted. Lindvall, the university president, later called it a riot. Titus sued Robertson and others, claiming he was the victim of a large conspiracy. His lawsuit will go to trial later this month.

Eventually, three professors aligned with Titus were fired. They and others complained to the ABA, saying Regent had no tenure system and should not be accredited. For a time, it appeared the controversy might sink Regent's chances for ABA approval.

link

h/t Nobizness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. LMAO.. typical, one of their graduates
has to resign in disgrace from the top law agency in the country and the school is awarded Accreditation. Medals of Freedom for everyone!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. So in other words ....
the school exists for the purpose of overthrowing the US Government and undermining the US Constitution. How is this legal? Isn't this a conspiracy? How did the school get accredited in the first place? :shrug: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. And, of course, THEY get to decide what God's will is. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC