Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The most powerful proof of moon landings is the fact

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tj2001 Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 07:28 AM
Original message
The most powerful proof of moon landings is the fact
that the Russians, who were our cold-war enemy and space rival, acknowledged that Americans landed on the moon. Many times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. You believe the cold war hoax?!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Don't waste your time.
The moon landing deniers are just a bunch of loonies (pun intended).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Can't you see the junk they left on the moon with a telescope?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. What an intellectually dishonest argument.
Even with a huge telecope, on earth we can only see objects to down to 10 miles ie say, anyting under hat would not be detectable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bulloney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Would the Hubble telescope pick up images on the moon?
Edited on Fri Jul-17-09 08:12 AM by bulloney
If it can, that would end the dispute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Nope at that distance Hubble has resolution of 60m
The lander base is about 8m across for the body 16m including the legs. It would be less than 1 pixel at that distance.

NASA is sent a mapping probe to the mapping probe to the moon with a resolution of 0.5m so we should have very detailed pics of the moon soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. class. you don't have it.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. +1
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
26. There's the mirror the astronauts left on the moon for laser experiments.
Scientists still bounce laser beams off that mirror to measure the distance between the Earth and the Moon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. Sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
30. Fail.
Telescopes are image enhancers not magnifiers.

Basic astronomy 101.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Silly boy! It's the big THEY...
...you know, the all-powerful puppet masters who run the whole show, who staged the Cold War, for whom all the world's governments are just playthings, THEY wanted to trick us into believing we went to the moon, so of course the Soviets played their necessary part in the whole puppet show. :crazy: :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetoride Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. How can this really
be a topic of discussion? The Tinfoil Hat crowd is always looking for things to refute, it used to be the that the Earth was flat now it UFO's and Moon Landing denial.

Lets face it, a goodly portion of the population is nuts..

-Peter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. There is undisputable proof of the landing......
...How else would MJ know how to moonwalk? See?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. Actually the most powerful evidence that man landed on the moon
Is the fact that there is a laser reflector up there. Several times a week, we shoot a laser up to this reflector on the moon, and it bounces back, giving us information about distance, wobble, position, etc. You can't simply drop a laser reflector from miles up and have it work. It has to be placed, and aligned, by hand.

Thus, day in, day out, we keep getting this evidence that yes, man once walked on the moon.
<http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/moon_worldbook.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I remember my dads buddy
rigging up a radio antennae with a parabolic antennae so we could listen in on the radio transmissions from the Apollo crews.
The only time we could pick up the radio signals was when the dish was pointing at the moon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Now THAT had to have been cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. Did you get to hear
the secret transmission? The one about the aliens mining the moon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
40. No but we did hear
them talking about some monolith thing they found.But then this god-awful screach came out of the speakers and we lost the signal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. Of course we walked on the moon...
We went up there with a spacecraft. And as that spacecraft circled the moon, we sent another smaller spacecraft down to the moon, as the larger spacecraft orbited the moon. Don't you remember the "one small step for man - one giant step for mankind"?

Then we played a little golf, collected a few rocks, got back into the little spacecraft and flew back up to the larger spacecraft, and came back down to earth and landed in the ocean. Why is that so hard not to believe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
33. You forgot a couple of them got to DRIVE on the moon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
13. Only 5% of the population thinks it's a hoax
And I'm sure that a good chunk of that 5% are people who just heard about it for the first time and from those who think it's a hoax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. And it looks we've got 5% of DU believing that it's a hoax!
And I've got a pretty good idea which 5% it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
42. I'd venture to guess well over 5% of DU
are serious moon landing deniers. The vast majority of the MIHOP brigade almost certainly is, for example.

Distrust of science + distrust of authority + zero critical thinking skills = pure whackadoodle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChickMagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
17. When the astronauts were on the moon
they placed a mirror in a specified location. There is an observatory
on earth beaming a laser every day to that mirror and measuring the
time it takes for it to return. From this data they have learned the
moon is moving away from the earth.

How did the mirror get there if not for the moon landing?

That's usually the question I ask of deniers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Every day? Don't think so. When ever the moon is in position maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. What day would the moon not be in position?
Sure, 12 hours of the day it's below the horizon; but some time during an given day, the moon (and the reflector, since nearly all the face we see is always pointing at us - there's not a small variation around the edges) will be in the right place. The only problem would be clouds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. The moon is stationary?
It does not orbit at a different rate than the Earth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Let me explain to you what a 'day' is:
A 'day' is the time in which the 'Earth' rotates once. Thus, during a day, someone on a point on the earth gets a direct line of sight to just about anything in over half the sky (exactly how much over half depends on the latitude of the observer - someone on the equator gets to see everything, someone at the North Pole only sees the northern half the sky). An object like the 'Moon', which orbits the Earth (in roughly the same plane as the Earth orbits the Sun) appears every day to anyone outside the Artic or Antarctic Circles (and on most days to people inside them too). Of course, that's often during the day, and sometimes the relative positions of the Sun, Moon and Earth are such that there's very little sunlight reflecting off the Moon to the Earth, so we don't notice it in the sky; but it's there, and we can bounce lasers off it, if we want (give or takes clouds in the way).

The Moon does indeed take the same time to go round the Sun as the Earth does; but that's not really relevant. The Moon orbits the earth, which orbits the Sun. I never said the Moon is 'stationary'. I said that some time during the day, the Moon will be in the right place - ie above the horizon. The Moon rotates at the same rate as it orbits the Earth, so we always see the same face (there are very slight variations, due to things like the orbit being a slight ellipse rather than a perfect circle). Since the reflectors were all placed on the 'near side of the Moon', when the Moon is above the horizon, the reflectors will be in sight too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. Heh.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChickMagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. The face of the moon we see is always facing us
They send it out every day according to the astronomer who does this.
Whether it's actually returned every single day I don't know enough
about lasers to say. They have received it enough to know that the
moon is moving away from the earth.

The astronomer who talked about this was on a program I was watching
on the science channel. He's the one who sends the laser pulse.

Here's a link I found:

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/missions/apollo/apollo_11/experiments/lrr/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #21
36. Info here on the Laser Ranging Retroreflector experiment.
Science Experiments - Laser Ranging Retroreflector
The Laser Ranging Retroreflector experiment was deployed on Apollo 11, 14, and 15. It consists of a series of corner-cube reflectors, which are a special type of mirror with the property of always reflecting an incoming light beam back in the direction it came from. A similar device was also included on the Soviet Union's Lunakhod 2 spacecraft. These reflectors can be illuminated by laser beams aimed through large telescopes on Earth. The reflected laser beam is also observed with the telescope, providing a measurement of the round-trip distance between Earth and the Moon. This is the only Apollo experiment that is still returning data from the Moon. Many of these measurements have been made by McDonald Observatory in Texas. From 1969 to 1985, they were made on a part-time basis using the McDonald Observatory 107-inch telescope. Since 1985, these observations have been made using a dedicated 30-inch telescope. Additional measurements have been made by observatories in Hawaii, California, France, Australia, and Germany.

Laser beams are used because they remain tightly focused for large distances. Nevertheless, there is enough dispersion of the beam that it is about 7 kilometers in diameter when it reaches the Moon and 20 kilometers in diameter when it returns to Earth. Because of this very weak signal, observations are made for several hours at a time. By averaging the signal for this period, the distance to the Moon can be measured to an accuracy of about 3 centimeters (the average distance from the Earth to the Moon is about 385,000 kilometers).

The Laser Ranging Retroreflector experiment has produced many important measurements. These include an improved knowledge of the Moon's orbit and the rate at which the Moon is receding from Earth (currently 3.8 centimeters per year) and of variations in the rotation of the Moon. These variations in rotation are related to the distribution of mass inside the Moon and imply the existence of a small core, with a radius of less than 350 kilometers, somewhat smaller than the limits imposed by the passive seismic and magnetometer experiments. These measurements have also improved our knowledge of changes of the Earth's rotation rate and the precession of its spin axis and have been used to test Einstein's theory of relativity.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/missions/apollo/apollo_11/experiments/lrr/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. The original landing denier was a full-blown Flat-Earther.
Or so I've read. :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
27. It would probably be more dificult to create the hoax
than to do the actual moon landing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. Exactly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
31. Well, they could've been bought off.
Or decided to keep silent so their space program could continue to loot the Soviet treasury. Or both.

That being said, I have no doubt we went to the moon. It's just that your argument is proof of nothing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikebloke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
34. They would have caused an itch.
If they really landed on the Moon, then they would have caused an itch. The Man in the Moon, then would've sneezed them off. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
35. It's funny when people treat this like it's a genuine question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
38. I'm not a moon landing denier, but for the hell of it I'll play Devil's advocate and say
Edited on Fri Jul-17-09 12:17 PM by arcadian
That every object now on the moon could have been placed there by unmanned missions. So the fact that there are artifacts there, the laser reflector, moon buggy, etc., argument doesn't really work. Also, all the moon rocks could very well have been collected by unmanned probes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
39. Proof? They brought back moon-rocks. Where else you gonna get moon-rocks but on the moon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
41. pffft.
Proof.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. That looks like the walk Marvin the Martian takes going to his mailbox.
Some 'proof' you have there.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Yup. Reality vs. fantasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. That picture proves nothing.
Looks like a badly focused pic of a kid's sandbox.

Don't make Marvin angry.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Ahem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Now you went and done it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Please don't move for a moment...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Ha! I've got you just where I want you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. What the...


How the hell did that get in this thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Lower your shields, and prepare to be boarded!



bljeghbe'chug vaj blHegh!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. This is Tranya.
Edited on Fri Jul-17-09 06:40 PM by Gold Metal Flake


It will fuck your shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Dude! Who's the green hottie?
Get me her number, will ya? I mean, dammmmn, boi!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC