Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good Tom Shales column on Walter Cronkite

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:58 AM
Original message
Good Tom Shales column on Walter Cronkite
As Walter Cronkite's night of retirement from "The CBS Evening News" grew closer and closer back in 1981, there were signs of palpable public panic -- one of them a briefly popular T-shirt on which was printed the horrified rhetorical question, "Oh, my God -- what are we going to do without Walter Cronkite.

The sentiment reflected how warmly Cronkite was regarded in the population of American celebrities. Television confers a different kind of stardom than had ever been seen before, more intimate than radio and far more immediate than the movies, and it made Cronkite more than merely an eminent or prominent public figure. He was a private figure, too, welcomed into millions of American homes -- a reporter and anchorman, yes, but also an honorary member of families he had never seen or met.

"Uncle Walter" was a sardonic but sentimental title, and so it is that Americans who grew up turning to Cronkite for the news of the day -- and regular readings of the American mind and mood -- might feel now that they have lost more than an acquaintance, more than an uncommonly well-informed neighbor, more than an abiding avuncular presence in their lives, even though he'd been retired for nearly three decades prior to his death yesterday at age 92.

Millions of Americans who'd parroted to each other the famous good-night from "The Huntley-Brinkley Report" -- "Good night, Chet," "Good night, David" -- now found themselves captivated by the man who signed off each night with: "And that's the way it is," followed by the date. Other newscasters would attempt imitations of the Cronkite sign-off -- Charlie Gibson of ABC News has an especially pathetic one these days -- but none ever made theirs as much a part of the national iconography.

Cronkite was more than another part of that system of symbols, catchphrases, familiar faces and self-caricatured faces; his persona became so prominent in American culture (one survey found him to be "the most trusted man in America") that he was credited with massive swings in public opinion -- most notably earning credit for turning the public against the Vietnam War after a visit there. President Lyndon B. Johnson was heard to observe that once he'd lost Walter Cronkite, he'd lost the American electorate, as well. And he'd lost the war.

He took us to the moon, he led us in mourning a hugely beloved leader, he helped bring an end to a disastrous regional conflict, and he played many other roles in the life of the nation and its citizen-viewers. Known to friends in the business for his thriftiness (it was said no one had ever seen him pick up a check at lunch) and a liquor-fueled capacity for impromptu Greek dances (or so it was reported by TV Guide), Cronkite was clearly a man who enjoyed the world on which he so faithfully reported, even when the news was cruel, cold or unbearably sad.

He was ours, we were his, and he didn't so much deliver the news to us as join us in experiencing the world outside our own homes and schools and towns. He won virtually every award that is given out in the annals of broadcasting, but he won a lot more than that. He earned our friendship, our trust and even, as we perhaps now realize more than at any other time in the relationship, our love.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/17/AR2009071703501.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cronkite didn't harangue or moralize.....
he didn't lecture or bloviate. He didn't dumb down the news, or spin it. Even when he declared the Vietnam Was un-winnable, you knew Cronkite had come to that conclusion after years of observation and careful thought.

He would be laughed off today's news shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC