Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservative Opponent Of Health Care-"NOW ACCEPTING DONATIONS" For His Medical Expenses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 10:05 AM
Original message
Conservative Opponent Of Health Care-"NOW ACCEPTING DONATIONS" For His Medical Expenses
Edited on Mon Aug-10-09 10:23 AM by kpete
The New Joe the Plumber

The conservative activist who claims he was beaten up by union thugs in St. Louis while protesting against health care reform is accepting donations towards his medical care because he was laid off recently and ... has no health insurance.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/

....................

Yesterday, about 200 conservative activists held a protest outside the SEIU office in St. Louis. Gladney was there -- bandaged and in a wheelchair -- as a featured guest. Some of the activists held signs that read, "Don't Tread on Kenny." Reader R.D. alerted me to this tidbit in the local news account of the protest:

Gladney did not address Saturday's crowd of about 200 people. His attorney, David Brown, however, read a prepared statement Gladney wrote. "A few nights ago there was an assault on my liberty, and on yours, too." Brown read. "This should never happen in this country."

Supporters cheered. Brown finished by telling the crowd that Gladney is accepting donations toward his medical expenses. Gladney told reporters he was recently laid off and has no health insurance.


Wait, the conservative opponent of health care reform, fighting (literally) to defeat a plan that would bring coverage to those who lose their jobs, lost his coverage because he got laid off?

more:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_08/019423.php

.............................

Faking victimhood: Just how hurt was that supposed victim of SEIU 'thuggery'?
VIDEO:
http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/faking-victimhood-just-how-hurt-was
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SacredCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Irony- party of one?"
I'm sure it'll be lost on the "protestors."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yup, just saw it in the St Louis paper yesterday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Gladney has set the standard for stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Perfect Karma
There are others who are next in line.... :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Too bad there isn't some kind of government plan congress can pass to help this poor soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. Getting treated for a bunch of fake injuries can get expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. shit
that ain't nothing....if it had been a real ass beating he wouldn't remember his name for a month ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. All that's missing is the backwards "b" on his face.
What a scumbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. Lawyers don't say things by accident. An "assault on my liberty" is not a physical assault.
The lawyer won't let Gladney speak because he is hoping to get this to trial and not have it thrown out in the first five minutes. The lawyer knows there was no physical assault on Gladney, so he fires up the crowd with a claim to an "assault on {Gladney's} liberty." In court, he'll be able to point out that Gladney never claimed anyone actually hit him. Oh, unless you watch the tape. This is cluster-fuck, legally. No case whatsoever, but plenty of PR value.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. Oh, the stupidity! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. There's a whole other level of irony here as well
It seems that back in 2002, when he was still a police officer, Gladney hit a prisoner in the booking area hard enough to knock him out of his chair. Three years later, that former prisoner sued Gladney in federal district court, alleging that as a result he was still suffering "from chronic headaches, neck pain, limited neck mobility, difficulty sleeping and concentrating, and sensitivity to loud noises and bright lights." The case went to a jury trial in 2006, and the claims were rejected as not credible.

You'd think Gladney might have learned the obvious lesson from this about playing the victim card -- but it seems that instead he learned the wrong one.


http://mo.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.%5CFDCT%5CEMO%5C2006%5C20060714_0001161.EMO.htm/qx

July 14, 2006

TERRY LYNN KIMBALL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ST. LOUIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, P.O. KENNETH GLADNEY, P.O. CLAUDE CROCKER AND METRO DUTY SERGEANT, DEFENDANTS.

Remaining for trial in this action is plaintiff Terry Lynn Kimball's claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 against Police Officer Kenneth Gladney, alleging that on February 28, 2002, in a booking area within the police department's Central Patrol Division, Officer Gladney struck plaintiff, knocking him out of his chair. . . .

Plaintiff has filed a motion in limine to exclude evidence of his prior misdemeanor convictions , deriving from two incidents in which plaintiff was convicted of misdemeanor assault or battery on police officers, one occurring before and one occurring after the incident at issue in this case. . . .

Plaintiff alleges, as set forth in his trial brief, that as a result of defendant Gladney's use of force, plaintiff continues four years later to suffer from chronic headaches, neck pain, limited neck mobility, difficulty sleeping and concentrating, and sensitivity to loud noises and bright lights. Plaintiff testified similarly in his deposition. Defendant argues that the evidence of plaintiff's employment shows that he worked full-time jobs involving stressful manual labor, that he regularly worked overtime, that his alleged symptoms did not cause plaintiff to miss work or interfere with his job duties, and that defendant quit his job at P.D. George because he was not getting as much overtime as he wanted.


http://mo.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.%5CFDCT%5CEMO%5C2007%5C20070111_0000056.EMO.htm/qx

Attorney Michael Wetmore was appointed on July 5, 2005 to represent plaintiff Terry Lynn Kimball in this action under 42 U.S.C. §1983 alleging an unconstitutional use of force by defendant Gladney, a St. Louis police officer. After the remaining claim was tried to a jury and judgment entered against plaintiff in November 2006, appointed counsel has timely submitted a request for reimbursement of expenses incurred in the representation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. Bwahahahahaha.... K & R !!!
:rofl::kick::rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Does the St. Louis bunko squad know about this?
Accepting "charitable" donations for a non-existent injury constitutes criminal fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC