Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Food Producers Warn Of Job Cuts Due To Sugar Shortage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tj2001 Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 09:41 AM
Original message
U.S. Food Producers Warn Of Job Cuts Due To Sugar Shortage
U.S. Food Producers Warn Of Job Cuts Due To Sugar Shortage
8/14/2009 10:33 AM ET

(RTTNews) - Major U.S. food producers warned the Obama Administration this week that an impending sugar shortage could lead to increased prices and job cuts unless restrictions on sugar imports are eased.

Food companies such as Kraft, Mars, General Mills and Hershey have warned that the nation see severe sugar shortages and prices for the product and other food items of which sugar is an essential ingredient could skyrocket. The firms are currently only allowed to import a certain amount of sugar (1.3 million metric tons) before they have to start paying import tariffs.

The companies recently wrote a letter to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack that said that without better access to cheaper imported sugar, "consumers will pay higher prices, food manufacturing jobs will be at risk and trading patterns will be distorted."

http://www.rttnews.com/ArticleView.aspx?Id=1040653&Category=Top%20story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't we have too much sugar in our food already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Just keep the sugar out of our foods.
Problem solved..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Especially foods that are already naturally "sweet".
and we could make up with Cuba, and get their sugar production going again.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Or they could reformulate and cut the sugar.
This sounds like when school districts threaten to cut bussing in order to get the voters to approve a tax increase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. First you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. I, for one, would love to see sugar imports increased.
As long as the industry removes high fructose corn syrup from our food supply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. yup get rid of that corn syrup and replace it with sugar
got no idea, apart from political reasons why they started using corn syrup instead of sugar in the first place...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Government subsidies for corn production.
The more corn the farmers grow, the more money they make.

That's why there was a such a huge push for Ethanol a few years ago as well - the farmers have a market for their product and the government pays them on top of the market rates to grow corn.

Agriculture subsidies are by far the largest 'welfare' program this country has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abumbyanyothername Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Ag sudsidies
are not going so much to small farmers as they are to big ag industries like ADM, ConAgra, Tyson etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abumbyanyothername Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Perhaps these are the political reasons
1) There were native peoples living on the plains. These people, for the most part, did not buy into the capitalist propaganda of Horatio Alger and were, therefore, difficult to control. Something had to be done about them.

2) The government decided that it was our Manifest Destiny to have whites populate the whole continent from sea to shining sea.

3) Land was stolen at gunpoint from the natives and given to whites, many of them Northern European immigrants.

4) The industrial revolution made these farmers wildly over-productive. World War I gave them an outlet for their produce and encouraged even more over-production. By the early 1920s these farmers were in a depression a full decade before the rest of the country.

5) Washington decided to create more and more protections for corn farmers and more and more incentives to grow corn.

6) Sugar tariffs are a part of this program.

7) With all this corn being grown, something has to be done with it. As a writer (Barbara Kingsolver?) explained, so long as the US farmer is producing 700 calories more per person per day more than we need to maintain our health and weight, we are going to be a nation of overweight people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. id rather we burn the corn as fuel than to have it in everything we eat
as to the historical notes in your post, i cant see why that would stop us from getting rid of the corn syrup from our diets and if we must have sugars at least make them natural cane etc.. As to the 700 calories extra a day, why not let people eat the extra if they want but encourage more excercise, id prefer that than being told to limit my calories...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. my thinking, as well. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Could this be the end of the Donut Burger?
Favorite brainfood of Birfers, Snuffers & Freepers? Oh noes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. First they came for the sugar and I did nothing...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. However, the truth is found further down in the article:
However, U.S. sugar manufacturers have insisted that there is no shortage of domestic sugar stock and that domestic supplies were actually increasing. They have argued that importing more sugar would not be cost effective because there is little difference between the world price and the U.S. market price.

The American Sugar Industry Alliance backed up these claims and said that a major domestic sugar cane harvest would begin later this month, and that a sugar beet harvest would begin in October.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC