During the whole Clinton/Lewinsky thing, I really couldn't stand this guy, but the things he has been saying and writing recently have me reconsidering my views. I admire his courage and principle. I still can't believe it, but I do.
Check out this piece he wrote for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Some 792 years ago, in Runnymede, England, a very unhappy King John was forced by a group of barons to sign a document called the "Magna Carta."
Despite the passage of so many centuries since that June day, and notwithstanding the fact that no one save a devoted cartographer could find the "meadow that is called Runnymede" on a modern map, the notion of a "Great Charter," clearly establishing rights of individuals and limiting the power of the governing authority, remains a central underpinning of Western civilization. These ideas form also the very basis of our own representative democracy; that is, until the administration of George W. Bush.
Yet, so little regard has the Bush administration for the rights of the people as opposed to the power of the government, that its attorney general recently told the American people, through testimony before the United States Senate, in effect, "don't worry so much about habeas corpus because you don't really have that right under our Constitution anyway." For many Americans, the shock of such words being spoken by an attorney general of the United States has not yet worn off, though uttered nearly three weeks ago.
Ignoring a law that requires a court order before surveilling Americans in the United States, or relegating a pesky and ancient "writ" to the category of a quaint and outworn technicality seem small steps indeed in such a world view; a view so at odds with the vision of Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry and James Madison as to be unrecognizable.
http://www.bobbarr.org/default.asp?pt=newsdescr&RI=820