still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 10:27 AM
Original message |
Why is the Sibel Edmonds testimony not considered "Latest Breaking News" |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-25-09 10:28 AM by still_one
and why aren't sites such as Raw Story and Huffington Post NOT reporting what Brad has reported?
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Beats me. It's even got 'girl on girl' action. She names names. nt |
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. What is happening. Even if the story isn't believed, it is news because Edmonds was under oath? /nt |
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. The fact that she is naming names, to me, is more important than being under oath, actually. |
|
These folks need to come out or be smoked out.
I guess we're too concerned with MO wearing hiking shorts on AF1.
|
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Look: If the Corporate Media decides to ignore a story, we do too... |
|
Otherwise we'll look too fringe. Can't have that...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:39 PM
Response to Original message |