Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could Smoking Pot Cut Risk Of Head, Neck Cancer?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 12:56 AM
Original message
Could Smoking Pot Cut Risk Of Head, Neck Cancer?
Could smoking pot cut risk of head, neck cancer?



Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:05pm EDT


NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - You've heard about using marijuana and drugs derived from it to keep some of the side effects of toxic cancer chemotherapy in check. But what if smoking marijuana for 10 to 20 years could actually protect against certain tumors?

In a study, researchers have found that long-term pot smokers were roughly 62 percent less likely to develop head and neck cancers than people who did not smoke pot. The new study featured 434 patients with head and neck cancers, which include tumors in the mouth, tongue, nose, sinuses, throat and lymph nodes in the neck, and 547 individuals without these cancers seen in the Greater Boston area from December 1999 to December 2003.

After factoring out the impact of smoking, drinking, and other factors that might influence the results, smoking marijuana from once every two weeks to three times every two weeks, on average, was associated with about half the risk of head and neck cancer, compared with less frequent use.

Those who took up pot smoking at an older age appeared to have less risk of these cancers than those who started it at a younger age. Compared to people who never smoked pot, those who began smoking marijuana between the ages of 15 and 19 years were 47 percent less likely to develop head and neck cancer, while users who began at age 20 or older had a 61 percent reduced risk, Kelsey and colleagues found.

http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTRE57O5DC20090825">MORE



- This is great news. After http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_surgery">what http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdominal_aortic_aneurysm">I've http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bladder_cancer">been http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endoscopy">through http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cystoscopy">lately, it's one less thing I'll worry about....
==============================================================================
DeSwiss


http://www.atheisttoolbox.com/">The Atheist Toolbox




http://www.dareland.com/index2.html">"No one has ever died from marijuana that wasn't shot by a cop."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kick!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. I'm putting that on my wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. their maximum dose was 3 every two weeks? this is a bullshit study.
that's like smoking 3 cigarettes every two weeks, and seeing what the result is. These idiots can get back to me when they tell me what the effect is of smoking 40 joints in a day, every day, for 20 years is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BB1 Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Right. I wonder about the same
'cause I've been smoking four to six joints every day for the past ten years. And pretty good shit too, original Dutch White Widow. And I never have headaches, too:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. HAs your pot been certified?
In order to qualify your marijuana for test purposes, you need to send me a couple of pounds of it for testing. I do this free of charge and the testing lasts for a period of one year. After the test, I will send you a detailed report on quality and acceptability of the sample.....if I remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BB1 Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. IIRC, you'd need to smoke
200 pounds of weed within 15 minutes to qualify for an overdose. Everything else is just short of the mark.

I think your mailman would be surprised indeed if I found a pound or so and mailed it to you. We've got some pretty nasty weed down here (THC% over 14...) and you'd probably need to lay down after just 2 reefers. But that's me assuming. Just get over here and I'll show you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. The Widow is legend here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Where does it say maximum? You just made that up.
Edited on Thu Aug-27-09 05:22 AM by JTFrog
You took one of the conclusions and made it the study basis?

After factoring out the impact of smoking, drinking, and other factors that might influence the results, smoking marijuana from once every two weeks to three times every two weeks, on average, was associated with about half the risk of head and neck cancer, compared with less frequent use.


"A questionnaire was adopted to collect information on lifetime marijuana use (decade-specific exposures) and associations evaluated using unconditional logistic regression."

Cases (n = 434) were patients with incident HNSCC disease from nine medical facilities in the Greater Boston, MA area between December 1999 and December 2003. Controls (n = 547) were frequency matched to cases on age (±3 years), gender, and town of residence, randomly selected from Massachusetts town books. A questionnaire was adopted to collect information on lifetime marijuana use (decade-specific exposures) and associations evaluated using unconditional logistic regression.

After adjusting for potential confounders (including smoking and alcohol drinking), 10 to 20 years of marijuana use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of HNSCC . Among marijuana users moderate weekly use was associated with reduced risk (OR0.5-<1.5 times versus <0.5 time, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32-0.85). The magnitude of reduced risk was more pronounced for those who started use at an older age (OR15-<20 years versus never users, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30-0.95; OR≥20 years versus never users, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17-0.90; Ptrend < 0.001). These inverse associations did not depend on human papillomavirus 16 antibody status. However, for the subjects who have the same level of smoking or alcohol drinking, we observed attenuated risk of HNSCC among those who use marijuana compared with those who do not.

Our study suggests that moderate marijuana use is associated with reduced risk of HNSCC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Thank you.
:D - I good to know there are a few of us still out there who read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. Mmmm I can just feel the cancer cells vanishing
no really.. i can.. wait.. did the dog just say something?.. no no.. it's alllll good. Legalize it! :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Holy Shite
This should mark the end of head and neck cancer in Jamaica. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. That just became my new sig line
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. Interesting study. Pic of baby smoking a doobie, completely disgusting.
Edited on Thu Aug-27-09 11:30 AM by Better Today
Unrec'ing because of pic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. I'll consider myself duly admonished....
...because everyone has their own standards of decency. It is your right, and I respect that. However, as Frank Zappa once remarked: "My best advice to anyone who wants to raise a happy, mentally healthy child is: Keep him or her as far away from a church as you can."

- Like I said, everyone's got their own standards....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. NO n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Sorry to burst your bubble, Drug Warrior, but chemicals in cannabis have a necrotic effect on
cancer cells.

This has been known for some time now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Precisely.
Edited on Fri Aug-28-09 03:16 AM by DeSwiss
The below research links are to articles, scientific studies and abstracts which report that the tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabinoids in marijuana can halt the spread the MRSA bacteria and numerous other types of cancer cells -- including:

MRSA: http://www.webmd.com/news/20080904/marijuana-chemicals-may-fight-mrsa

Prostate Cancer: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T36-3XFTGPR-X&_coverDate=09%2F24%2F1999&_alid=422767905&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_qd=1&_cdi=4938&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=1c29920efb1acb800723560310e9004e

Breast Cancer: http://mct.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/6/11/2921

Lung Cancer: http://www.nature.com/onc/journal/v27/n3/abs/1210641a.html

Pancreatic Cancer: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/66/13/6748

Brain Cancer: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16804518

And in addition to the cancer research, here's a report from an Austrailian newspaper about a French study that found that cannabidiol in marijuana may prevent the development of prion diseases such as BSE because it inhibits the accumulation of prion proteins in infected mice and sheep. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy: http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22430980-23109,00.html

- Most of these studies were funded by foreign governments and/or foundations over the past 10 years. The current US research efforts (for lack of a better term), is barely playing catch-up at this point. Its been that way for some time, since all research here has previously been quashed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Thanks.
It's sad how much of this is ignored / blown off by people here.

Why? Cause it's DEMON WEED!

Just goes to show how well brainwashing works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. I heard about something similar last week...
Edited on Thu Aug-27-09 11:49 AM by redqueen
apparently cannabinoids inhibit the failure of apoptosis, which is involved in the growth of cancer cells.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Check post #15 above.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
20. Probably BS... but it's still good for some peoples heads.
I would be one of those.

By the way, I know that's a photoshop and everything, but it's a disgusting picture that will win not one heart or mind. I'm very, very 420 friendly, and I'm bothered by the pic. Just my take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC