Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lamont On Lieberman: He's Echoing GOP's Health Care Talking Points

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:13 PM
Original message
Lamont On Lieberman: He's Echoing GOP's Health Care Talking Points

Sam Stein
Lamont On Lieberman: He's Echoing GOP's Health Care Talking Points
First Posted: 08-27-09 04:09 PM | Updated: 08-27-09 05:22 PM


Nine months after the Democratic leadership voted to allow Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) to retain his chairmanship of a key committee and continue caucusing with the party, the Connecticut Independent continues to rankle progressives.

Democrats who expected the Senator to tussle with President Barack Obama on foreign policy matters have watched with a mix of irritation and horror as the two have butted heads on the year's key domestic item instead.

"He is playing right into the Republican talking points" on health care, said Ned Lamont, the Connecticut Democrat who defeated Lieberman in the 2006 Democratic Senate primary, but lost to him in the general election after Lieberman ran as an independent.

"I don't think Republicans have any interest in a good bill or a bad bill. I just don't think they want Obama to move the agenda forward on health care. And it just so happens that yet again Senator Lieberman is playing into all the Republican talking points and it can fundamentally jeopardize another generational opportunity to change how we deliver health care in our country."

Lieberman hasn't shied away from expressing concerns about the policy specifics of Obama's agenda. His opposition to a public option for insurance coverage, for instance, has been known for several months.

But the Senator took the criticism to a new level this past Sunday, when he urged the White House to consider passing three quarters of the reform package while saving the rest for better economic times. He also spoke out against the use of reconciliation, which would allow the passage of legislation with 50 votes.

more...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/27/lamont-on-lieberman-hes-e_n_270675.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. The best thing we could do to get rid of Lieberman is push for a viable Repub candidate.
That's the only reason he beat Lamont in the general. The Repukes has some clown as a candidate that all the Repukes in the state voted with all the Dem turncoats to elect Lieberman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueDemKev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I wish Lamont had won
The reason the Republicans put up such a weak candidate in 2006 was because they figured they had no chance of unseating Lieberman. However, when Lieberman lost the primary and then ran as an independent, Lieberman got all the Democratic voters who had supported him in the primary, plus a bunch of Republican voters who didn't want the liberal Lamont to get in.

It's too bad. Ned Lamont would have been a great senator. By hey, at least Lieberman isn't as horrible as Zell Miller was here in Georgia. Talk about stabbing lifelong friends in the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is this what you wanted, Vermont?
Somehow, I don't think so. And as for not using reconciliation, why does Sen. Lieberman hate America so much that he isn't willing to submit to majority rule? We haven't always done the best job of governance in the United States, but why does he want to change the way we've always decided things? Apparently, he's joining the ranks of crazy Mike Enzi, who won't vote for anything that doesn't pass the Senate with 75 or 80 votes. Yeah, we all remember how "bipartisan" the Republicans were between 2000 and 2006. They wouldn't have dreamed of doing anything, like meddle in the Schiavo affair, with anything less than that!

It's time for Mr. Lieberman to go back to private life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Or CT?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Nertz, and I know better
At least, that sounds believable. Yeah, Connecticut! Is this what you wanted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Always has been a Sam Nunn Democrat ,who finally came out of the closet.
Edited on Thu Aug-27-09 06:27 PM by orpupilofnature57
Nobody did better for Ronnie than Sam as a Demo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R for Lamont.
I'm STILL pissed that the Old Boys Club reinstated Lieberman with honors after his betrayal.

If it was up to me, Lieberman wouldn't have even gotten a space in the parking lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I HATE TURNCOATS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Me too.
Elected by Republiks on a solid Repiblik record (except for abortion) and our "leadership" lets that asswipe get off with no penalty at all.
:banghead:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. The fact that Democrats in the good ole boys club supported Liarmann points to a very
serious problem in the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC