Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When England ruled the world.. a timeline

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-29-09 03:46 PM
Original message
When England ruled the world.. a timeline
Edited on Sat Aug-29-09 03:47 PM by SoCalDem
The following table explains when various territories entered or left the British Empire. It can be quite confusing as the borders of these territories could and did change, name changes were frequent, colonies amalgamated and combined with one another - not to mention various treaties and wars! It is very difficult to keep track of all of these changes over the course of the entire history of the empire. There were also different classifications of territories:

Companies - initially private companies capitalised from Britain - tried to set up their own colonies as private commercial concerns. They frequently found the administration far more expensive than they expected and so often turned to the British government for help - particularly when wars or rebellions occurred. I have also included a few settler/missionary inspired settlements in this category.

Colonies were those areas directly ruled by a governor on behalf of the British government and representing the Crown. The governor was responsible to the Colonial Office in London, although he usually had wide powers of discretion. These were the most common form of imperial control.

Protectorates were territories where the local rulers could continue ruling domestically but they had ceded foreign and defence to the British. In fact, even in protectorates, British advisers frequently held influence far beyond foreign and defence fields.

Dominions were those colonies that were granted significant freedom to rule themselves. The settler colonies were afforded this freedom. Dominions were fully independent countries after the 1931 Statute of Westminster, although their Head of State continued to be the British sovereign. I have included some other examples of self-governing colonies in this category.

Mandates were set up after World War One as German and Turkish colonies were passed to Britain and France to prepare for self government on behalf of the League of Nations. Then, after World War Two, the United Nations issued its own mandates.

You can gauge the relative size, population and economic effectiveness of the varying colonies in 1924 by looking at this table.

http://www.britishempire.co.uk/timeline/colonies.htm
.......................................................


If you've ever wondered what they were, when they "came on-board", and when thney left, here's a useful table.. It's also a primer worth looking at in relation to many of the current "hot-spots".. Maybe just "up and leaving" is not the best way , after all:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-29-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very interesting; thanks!
Edited on Sat Aug-29-09 03:51 PM by Posteritatis
Some parts could use some more nuance - Canada's independence was a continuum running from 1867 to 1982, for example, with most things of consequence handled by 1931 as a partial result of the Great War - but it's great to see the broader picture all in one place like that.

That winds up on my Neat History Things list anyway. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iterate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-29-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very handy, thanks
Sometimes there's no substitute for pinning down the detail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-29-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. It might be worth adding "Commonwealth" off to the right
That gets even more complicated. E.g., South Africa left the Commonwealth and then rejoined it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC