Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beyond Parabens: 7 Other Cosmetic Ingredients You Need to Avoid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:37 PM
Original message
Beyond Parabens: 7 Other Cosmetic Ingredients You Need to Avoid
Consumer choice is a powerful thing. Say "jump or I'll spend my cash somewhere else" and you'll set executives scrambling to use one another as makeshift human trampolines. It's for this reason and this reason alone—at least for the major corporations—that we're seeing such a proliferation of products cheerily proclaiming that they're BPA-free. Well, parabens are the bisphenol-A of the beauty industry, from the scary headlines to the happy proclamations that beam at you when a product has kicked them to the curb.

But as we mentioned before, parabens aren't the only nasty no-no to avoid. Here are seven other toxic ingredients that regularly hitch a ride on cosmetics and skincare products. Pay heed to these red flags the next time you're out cruising with your shopping cart—who knows, perhaps some well-dressed man will approach you to ask if Bill from Accounting could perform some aerial acrobatics for your pleasure.


http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/08/beyond-parabens.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. sunscreens / nanoparticles
received google alert that UK is studying and highly suspects nanoparticles in sunscreens and cosmetics are causing parkinsons and alzheimers. same ingredients in diesel fuel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. which sunscreens are SAFE?
that's what I wanna know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think any of them are truly safe
A colorless chemical that keeps ultraviolet rays out? There's something basically wrong with this picture. I recommend using tinted moisturizer, a pigmented product, for all ages and genders. Paint protects the underlying surface because it's got pigment in it; tinted moisture does the same thing for your skin. And COVER UP--wear clothing! Walk around with your body uncovered and bad things will happen to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. LOL wut?
What's wrong with colorless compounds that absorb UV?

Tinted moisture? FTW?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They don't actually DO it, for one thing...
I used to work with vehicle wraps, and all vehicle wraps are laminated to keep rocks and shit from scratching the ink. All overlams contain UV absorbers, which should in theory keep the underlying ink from fading. They wrapped a bunch of trucks for a HVAC company about a year before I went to work there. The vehicles went out the door a very bright yellow. Fifteen months later, those same vehicles came back--all grossly faded. We're talking a decrease in density from 100 percent yellow to 65 percent yellow--it took me several hours to get this exact number. Admittedly, yellow fades like fuck; it is photoreactive to an extent no other color is.

I'll give you some relevant data now. The rate of lip cancer in men is three times that of women. http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/oral/riskfactors/ Why would that be? Ultraviolet light is directly related to lip cancer prevalence, and women are much more likely to use products that will keep UV light off their lips--specifically, lipstick. In places where cosmetics are not used or are seldom used, like rural areas in the US and in third-world countries, the prevalence of lip cancer is probably equalized between the genders. I'm a realist; I know that men aren't going to start wearing lipstick just because it prevents cancer. Men still chew tobacco, and that CAUSES cancer, so doing something completely out-of-gender to prevent cancer ain't gonna happen.

Men probably won't start wearing tinted moisture (it's one-third foundation and two-thirds moisturizer) but it wouldn't hurt. It's not like you can see the product on your face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Your link's broken
among other things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. 300 sunscreens have it...from what I've seen on net
husband has parkinsons and is freaking out...would appreciate if anyone knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onestepforward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. This a good link:

http://www.ewg.org/whichsunscreensarebest/2009report

It has been a really great resource for me. You can look up anything cosmetic and it can help you decide which products are better than others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abumbyanyothername Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why not take the simple approach?
Avoid buying products. Period. Full stop.

Because what can happen is that you get to using a product, like say Tom's of Maine Toothpaste, and you think you are being all happy and green and animal friendly. And then along comes Colgate, which does testing on animals, or at least used to, and they snap up Tom's and don't bother to change the name, or announce in the consumer press much less on the grocer's shelf that Tom's is now a Colgate product, and all of a sudden you are supporting animal cruelty when you never in a million years wanted to do that.

And life is so easy when everything you buy comes right off the farm. Or better yet, right out of your own garden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. go back to using plain baking soda maybe. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC