ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:21 PM
Original message |
If there is any truth to a JRE sex tape: How do we know that Rielle didn't make it? |
|
Everyone is assuming that Edwards made the tape.
I'm sure he's not THAT dumb.
Cui Bono?
Rielle Hunter much more than JRE - after all sounds like the perfect tool to blackmail John to me.
Moreover who had the means?
Rielle Hunter - she was Edwards videographer after all. She had the equipment and know how to make the tape.
Before we turn DU into a bash Edwards fest again, let's be sure that Rielle didn't make the tape (assuming it actually turns out to exist at all.)
Thanks.
We know return you to your regularly scheduled prurient interest distraction threads.
Doug D.
|
Teaser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message |
1. oh why not just bash him anyway |
|
he's earned it. pathetic creep.
|
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Since she had the equipment and the profession... |
|
...I would assume she made the tape.
Oh, I am referring to videotography of course...:hi:
|
Happyhippychick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I assumed that she did make it and he didn't know. Isn't that the buzz or did I just make a wild |
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. He may be a cheating M/F asshole... |
|
...but the guy is NOT that dumb to only think with his dick 100% of the time. I would side on the conclusion that she made it without his knowledge.
|
spiritual_gunfighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
So if a Edwards sex tape pops up, it was made without his knowledge??? John Edwards was an idiot for what he did, to do that to his wife, to do that to his career and to do that to the Democratic party had he gotten the nomination. I wouldnt doubt for a second that if a tape pops up he was the one making it with her. Please...
|
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
27. Thank you for the personal attack... |
|
...welcome to my IGNORE list. If you cannot discuss like an adult, I am not interested in your comments.
Click....
|
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Some here are assuming the opposite. |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
But thanks very much for yet another purient interest thread. *roffle*
|
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
21. Yeah but at least I admit it was a prurient interest thread.. |
monmouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
25. So did I. If there is a tape, that's her "leverage."....n/t |
MNDemNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message |
4. How the fuck cares, he is dead. |
joeybee12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message |
7. And he just happened to NOT see the video camera pointed at him... |
|
...that makes him even dumber than making the tape himself.
|
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. and if it were a woman who was the victim of surreptitious taping would you be calling her "stupid"? |
joeybee12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
16. I didn't call it surrpeitious...I think even if she had the equipment, he |
|
had to know she was making the tape...you can't just not see the thing...I doubt it was a hidden camera, but go ahead, knee-jerk all you want.
|
EmeraldCityGrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message |
8. It was reported yesterday Elizabeth is posting on message boards |
|
in John's defense. Is that you Elizabeth? :evilgrin:
|
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. I wish... I just worked on JRE's campaign here in FL and met him a few times |
|
when he came to town.
I was very disappointed but a lot of JRE threads here are just ridiculuous pile ons.
|
Chulanowa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He still slept with her. She knew he was married. They're both douchebags in this situation. What's your point?
|
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. Just trying to get the who douchebagged who how part right. |
Chulanowa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
23. Ah, making a flowchart? |
|
Well... Sounds fun, I guess?
|
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
LeftyMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Let's stop trying to find ways to paint him as the victim of his own stupid, self-centered behavior. |
|
I don't give a flying fuck who recorded his having sex with a woman other than his cancer stricken wife.
The fact that he was having sex with a woman other than his cancer stricken wife, while running for president no less, is really quite enough to condemn him as a completely contemptible douchebag worthy only of scorn.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Er... not everyone. I don't assume that he made it, or even that it exists. |
|
One thing's for sure though... Edwards sure must have pissed that guy off.
|
lumberjack_jeff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Oct-01-09 03:29 PM by lumberjack_jeff
That POOOR woman was forced, no COERCED into participating in a videotape so that he could blackmail her... or sell it or something.
Yeah, I know she is a videographer hoping to marry her millionaire boyfriend when his wife died, but implying that she is a grownup capable of volition is a big no-no.
:sarcasm: cuz it's the law.
|
Bobbie Jo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Apparently he was dumb enough to put himself in a compromising position... |
|
with a blackmailing "videographer." C'mon :wtf:
|
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
rubberducky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Makes no difference to me who made the tape or if there ever was a tape. |
|
He KNEW better than to do what he was doing. He did not just owe fidelity to Elizabeth, but to the people who supported him. What the hell did he think would happen once this came out? What the hell kind of blackmail would this have opened him up to? Was he stupid enough to believe this would not ever come out? Shame, shame, shame on him AND Elizabeth, if she knew this.
|
EmeraldCityGrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
26. Thank you for stating the obvious.Elizabeth. |
|
As far as candidate spouses are concerned she was the most driven I have seen. Young claims Edwards had as many as thirteen affairs on the trail. Wives know when there's that degree of infidelity. The press has stated they were apprehensive about reporting the rumors early on out of respect for Elizabeth and her health. I don't think Edwards wanted the nomination. I think he was pressured by her drive and ambition.
What a mess and legacy they've created for ALL the kids involved.
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 07:42 PM
Response to Original message |
28. It's just one more reminder of why he should be kicked in the balls once a day. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 12:07 AM
Response to Original message |