Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cantwell's weak public option may turn out to be a very smart strategic move.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:23 AM
Original message
Cantwell's weak public option may turn out to be a very smart strategic move.
If the finance committee's bill comes out with ANY kind of public option, that will probably mean that every bill coming out of either the Senate or the House will have a public option. So when the Senate and the House work on reconciling their different bills, the bottom line is that it will include a public option. At that point, it will be much easier to move to the robust option that is preferred by the House and many in the Senate.

It's not over till it's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. A Sound Analysis, Ma'am
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. We're winning, despite Cantwell's bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. I don't know if we're winning...
...but keeping the possibility of a win alive would be a major, if unsung, accomplishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. That was my thinking
of course there is also the ... states can do it...

Saskatchewan...

Not my preferred way, but hey...

Regardless the battle just begun when this comes out and is signed. Trust me, it will stink...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. They key is to have a public option that has thepotential to grow
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 12:34 AM by bluestateguy
Don't forget that Social Security was not a universal program when it started, but gradually that is how it evolved. We may have to settle for the same thing with the PO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's far from great... true, but it's introduction was very cleverly timed IMO. She's been
working on it (revising it) furiously for several days (since the 2 PO amendments were flushed). I think she set up a desk right outside the door. It's been fascinating to watch the whole process. Baucus took mostly all repub amendments Thurs morning, knowing that Cantwell's amendment would be brought out right after lunch followed immediately by Shumer's amendment. It appeared that the repubs (Kyle) were all set to pounce on the Cantwell amendment immediately but Shumer threw a wrench into their plans. Boy were they pissed. "We're supposed to take turns" Kyle said. Baucus reminded them that the whole morning was devoted to repub amendments. Stabenow dropped a couple of "That's why many of us are for the public option" bombs on them. She was great. I was impressed with the way the whole debate was timed. I could go on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'd be happy for you to "go on."
I would have like to have been a fly on those walls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I've watched nearly every minute and here are a few observations, tho there are
plenty here who would disagree with me. Cantwell was always about 30 seconds late for every vote. I believe that's because she was out in the hallway pounding away at her amendment. She did an outstanding job, was able to answer every question, and was given huge kudos from Baucus for the thorough job she did. IMO, he set that amendment up. Kyle's head nearly exploded. Stabenow consistently had the last word before any amendment went to vote. It appears she was assigned this task. She put the "common American's" face on each amendment and occasionally threw a dig. For example, on at least two occasions yesterday alone, repubs made statements about lack of competition and people needing more choices. She jumped on each with "that's why most of us support the PO". On soooo many occasions, the simple solution was the PO and I think by the end of the debate that was a hell of a lot more obvious than it was at the beginning. Lincoln was very careful to only vote down amendments that she knew were going down anyway, thereby "saving face" as the tough-ass she likes to be thought of as. I think Snowe had a bad day, especially after the Cantwell amendment was laid on the table. She appeared confused and frustrated. Her arguments weren't making sense and she started defending stupid repub amendments, something she hadn't been doing theretofore. Just before they broke for dinner, she offered up an angry rant which didn't make any sense at all. I'd guess that 85% of the amendments the repubs offered were voted down and I believe the final committee bill on Tuesday(?) will get NO republican support, including Snowe. Baucus knew this from the git-go IMO. I think the guy knows what he's doing. We'll find out over the next couple of weeks. I predict reconciliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'm keeping my fingers crossed till the end of the year. Unless something
good happens before then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoJoWorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yes, I totally agree.
At this point, just getting the damned bill out of committee is what we needed in order to move on; but slipping the Cantwell thing in at the last, is definitely a "strategic move," as you suggest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC