Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We should assume that Brazil had a better bid.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:09 PM
Original message
We should assume that Brazil had a better bid.
Unless something substantive is revealed we should be good sports congratulate Brazil and assume that the IOC made the decision because they had the best bid.


Before gifts to IOC voters had a big impact and old personal connections also had a big impact.

It was given to Athens on largely symbolic and emotional reasons and the IOC probably learned its lesson with all of the problems that arose from their lack of preparations and would not give a bid out to a city that didn't have an excellent bid.

So the fact that Brazil is the first South American country to get it probably had some effect but I doubt that they would have given it to them if they didn't have an outstanding bid.

Unless there is something specific that is reported let's just assume that Brazil had a better bid.

To speculate on other issues is not only patronizing it tinges of a colonial and even racist point of view.


Congratulations Rio!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Recommended.
No need to blame it on Rio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. i think that the ioc was also reacting to the previous 8 years of american hegemony.
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 12:12 PM by dysfunctional press
it was more about the worldwide damage caused by lil' boots and his gang of thugs, than obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. True. I don't see how that couldn't have played a role.
Is it wise to give an Olympic bid to a country involved in 2 wars?

Is that in keeping with the Olympic spirit?

It truly did look like the Chicago bid was lacking in enthusiasm, but doesn't that accurately represent our country right now, after all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. except even that diminishes Rio's accomplishment.


Rio also beat out Spain and Tokyo who did not have Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Chicago came in last.
Many of us reacting not so much to Rio's win, but an apparent slap in the face to Chicago, which was thought to have a superior bid even if the presentation of it was lacking.

It's not shocking that Rio won, but it is a bit shocking that Chicago came in last.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. BBC radio
said that Chicago was the favorite this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. chicago had the overall 'best' bid.
rio has been made bids for the past 3 olympiads(including this one).

i hope that chicago tries again for 2020- but i doubt that they will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Bush's fault! It never loses it's panache.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I guess she is having a "maraca moment"? - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. With the crime rate in Rio she perhaps had her clothes stolen..
I'm not objecting to her imiginative substitute however..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am glad South America has finally won the event!
This kind of event SHOULD be moved from continent to continent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Agreed.
It was time they had a chance to shine for a world audience. Sometimes the American sense of entitlement really irks me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. They are separate issues.
Why Rio got the bid and why the media seems dumbfounded Chicago didn't.

I absolutely believed Rio had the better bid. I saw a bit of Chicago's video presentation and it was downright dreary.

But the media made the assumption before the presentations were made that Chicago would likely win. That's what smacks of racism and colonialism, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree the public presentation was terrible but the more important issues
probably had to do with infrastructure, although the fact that they would choose a dreary speaker shows they weren't on the ball as much as they thought they were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. They say that, based on infrastructure, Chicago had the best bid.
And that, based on already existing infrastructure, Madrid was tops (already had 78% of venues built).

Rio was promising the biggest investment, however.

So I really do believe this was in part an issue of how emotionally compelling the bid was. Brazil outdid us. However, I can't help but wonder what the IOC thought of our current involvement in two wars and the message that would send about the Olympic Games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. I like Lula; so if it wasn't to be Chicago, I'm glad it was Rio. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Anything other than "congratulations, Rio" and moving on is just weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. very
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyLoochka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. I was hoping Rio
would get them. Yes, undoubtedly they put together a great bid, but I think they were probably a heavy favorite all along due to no country in South America ever having had the Olympics.

Why should the Olympics go to the same old, same old? The US has had the summer games four times and the winter games four times.

Europe has had the summer games 15 times and the winter games 13 times.

Countries outside of the US and EU have only had the summer games 6 times and the winter games 4 times.

Time to give some other places a chance. Brazil is a great choice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. Congratulations Rio.
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. Parabéns, Brasil!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ctaylors6 Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. Did you see video today? Rio: party on beach; Chicago: cold drizzle
I know it's not that simplistic at all, but every sports reporter in the world is probably celebrating
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. they did, and it was obvious
and I had said as much weeks ago -- there were too many factors in their favor to award it somewhere else (not least of which was the fact alone that it had never been in South America before)...I'm just pissed over the:

1. Celebrating the fact that no matter who won; as long as Chicago didn't get it...

2. The "Obama should NEVER have gone" talking point, which I'm seeing on both the left and right -- Folks, if it were any other U.S. city than Chicago, he probably would have stayed home...But it's his city and he HAS to put in an appearance, especially since it was an outside shot from the start (nevermind the fact that he was only gone for ONE goddamned day and the MSM is thinking the country will fall apart if he isn't at his desk, AND the fact that leaders from the other countries showed)...

3. The whole "We're better off without the heavy olympic burden and its price tag" meme: I'm not from Chicago; so I don't know everything -- If people want to argue that they have zero confidence of city leadership putting on a great summer games that reaps benefits for the entire populace for years to come; then I'm willing to listen...But PLEASE don't say the oympics are just some big black hole of debt that has no tangible rewards and the host city is doing us a favor by eating a loss...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. Or, BRIC is beginning to have some real clout
and the US is on the downswing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC