Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Dance Routine Too Sexy for Sacramento School?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:49 PM
Original message
Was Dance Routine Too Sexy for Sacramento School?
Was Dance Routine Too Sexy for Sacramento School?

SACRAMENTO, CA - A song team routine at Rio Americano High School's Aloha event to welcome new students has drawn fire for being too racy and sexually explicit.

Rio Americano parent P.J. Bascom said the routine crossed the line.

"It was not something I would want my son looking at. I didn't find it to be appropriate or acceptable," she said. Bascom is a coach for the Junior Raiders cheerleaders, who work out at the school, but are not affiliated with the high school.

YOUTUBE: See the complete dance routine

"As a parent on the PTA here, it has been discussed whether there's action going to be taken. At this time, they're not allowing the dance any further," Bascom said.

Rio student John Butterfield wrote a piece for the school's newspaper, objecting to the routine's "...moves that are explicitly sexual, which would have been almost all of this rally's routine."

http://www.news10.net/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=67998&catid=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. seemd pretty tame to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. To me as well, but will watch a few more times just to be sure
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Talibaptist morality police strike again. Don't they have a mosque to go bomb, or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. What a bunch of prudes
That routine was no more sexual than any other cheer squad does across the country.

In fact, they had far more clothes on than most squads doing far worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. What's wrong with being sexy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. uhm lol, that was a normal boring high school cheer/dance squad
they were even wearing pants and blouses no skimpy cheerleader outfits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ah the good ol' American Taliban at it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. "It's a competition and they want to be the best"
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 01:01 PM by MissMillie
Then they should work harder on performing their movements in unison... and you know, all those shake your booty movements are not so easily done in unison.

Being sexual doesn't make you a better dancer.

There was a day when being a cheerleader actually involved cheering.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Tame & lame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Have these people ever seen a high school cheerleading contest or even a routine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I'd be willing to bet good money they don't get out of the house much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Pretty skanky.
All that was missing was the pole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripper11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wow..that was nothing really.
They were wearing long pants, tops that covered the majority of their torso.
Yeah there were a few hip grinds here and there, but really?
Ever watch a lingerie commercial at 7pm at night on any network channel? Jesus...prude or what!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. A lingerie commercial? How about a soda commercial!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:04 PM
Original message
Sacramento, and the out-lying areas can be pretty stupid sometimes.
Think Dan Lungren.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. Think Doolittle - and his NEOCON conservatives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. Didn't see any cold cuts so it's no worse than what's on national broadcast tv, i.e. -
So You Think You Can Dance.

I just think this is a case of jealousy on the parents part and probably says a lot about their own home life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. I was expecting stripper moves or something.
This was a tame version of a Britney Spears music video. A little hip swiveling, but no more than their GRANDPARENTS did in high school to Elvis.

Get a life parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think someone needs a dictionary.....
to discover the difference between "explicit" and "suggestive."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. There were a total of four moves that could have been considered eyebrow raising.
  1. The bend over and grind. 1:02
  2. The old pelvic thrust 1:20
  3. The double-handed crotch framing 1:44
  4. Classic arm extend boobie waggle 1:52

Sexy? I guess. Too sexy? Not with clothes on...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avAeRjiidLk

Meh. Big deal. Mommy needs to get a grip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. Reads like a Table of Contents for a How-To book... :)
.
.
Arms-Extended Boobie Waggle (Classic) . . . . 14
Arms-Extended Boobie Waggle (Modern)  . . . . 15
Double-Handed Crotch Framing  . . . . . . . . 17
Pelvic Thrust (Classic) . . . . . . . . . . . 29
.
.
.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. We're sexy! We're cute! We're popular to boot!
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. That's a little much for high school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. BWAAAHHHH
You should see the "Worship Dance" group that we have around here. And most of those girls are under 14.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. Looked like every other high school cheer routine I've seen.
Someone's a prude. So the pretty cheer squad shook their booties a little? Isn't that the point of having the pretty girls on the squad. Sex sells, even in high school. They could just stand there and the boys would be appreciative in their own special way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. Sexy is what's in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. The only controversy here is that the dancers couldn't stay coordinated
I remember my high school's drill team having a more cohesive approach to their routines, and that was 25 years ago. Maybe I'm being a little over-critical, with modern drill teams pushing themselves to amp up their performances, but there's still something to be said for timing and precision in these things.

Too sexy? Nah. The booty-shaking while bent over might have been a little daring, but not overtly sexual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. I would imagine it's hard to get a group of bootys to wiggle in unison...
Which is probably just as well -- completely synchronized booty-shaking (or boobie-wiggling, for that matter) might tilt the earth off its axis or cause a tear in the fabric of space-time or something. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. Anyone watching the new musical sitcom called 'Glee'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
26. I kept waiting for them to rip off their tear-away pants.
Never happened.

Very tame.

I've been to USC, UCLA, and L.A. Laker games, if you need a point of reference on what I think is a little much for high school. What I saw on the video ain't even close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
29. Rio Americano dance routine crosses line? So, it was their fault that Chicago lost the Olympics ...
to Rio!

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DutchLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
31. When is this country finally getting over its prudeness and repressed sexuality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
32. Even a cursory look at youtube finds some FAR sexier routines done while wearing
FAR less. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. And the links to such are not in your reply why?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Because you asked...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
33. OK - All I can think of is Jim Ward's Representative Squeezy McFeelpants:
Ahhhhhh my, my, my, my, my.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC