Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else think there's more to the David Letterman thing? i.e. the mother of his son?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 12:49 AM
Original message
Anyone else think there's more to the David Letterman thing? i.e. the mother of his son?
I haven't seen many stories in the news mention this, though some have hinted or alluded that there may be something. They all seem to agree on one thing though, that the relationship which spawned the "extortion plot" was with his former assistant Stephanie Birkett that ended when she gave birth to his son.

Uh...the relationship conveniently ended with the birth of his son? Could he have gotten Stephanie pregnant by accident and she gave birth but he made her give it up? Could he have gotten her pregnant on purpose, as an agreement with her to give a child to him and his wife?

The "extortion plot" MUST have been more about him having sex with his assistant(s) as they were two consenting adults, so there is NO WAY this info could have been worth $2 Million. Instead, I think the guy found out that Stephanie had little Harry and was wanting to blow the roof off of the whole story.

After all, it said he had written screen plays and stuff about this and had found evidence...really, like most of our reaction has been, who cares if he had sex with her? What kind of incredible screenplay is that? But that he got her pregnant??? Awww, now that's more interesting. That's a bigger scandal that he could have thought was worth $2 Million.

Just remember on issues like this, Letterman is seen as admirable for bringing this to light on his own accord, which could just mean that he's copping to the easiest part so that nobody digs any deeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. they are both consenting adults...why do we have the right to know about their sex life?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. When one of them is the boss, that "consenting" is not a real one
If a boss goes around picking women employees as if he is a medieval King "deflowering" virgin brides, this means harassment and the Supreme Court ruled about it.

Some CEOs had to resign for a similar relations with "consenting" subordinates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yes, clearly she was raped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. No one said he did that.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. ever heard of star struck female? groupie?

I witness a young female come into our workplace, and throw herself at the boss for a year...he finally caved in, and left a 18yr marriage..women aren't so innocent either...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. No, they are not. This is why he is the boss
and should deflect such throwing, moving them to different departments, if necessary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. He "caved in".
Really, now?

He could have resisted. Period. He "caved in" because the woman was younger and slimmer than the "
older" model at home.

Ridiculous.

(It's your wording I object to, not you. He didn't "cave in," he ruined his wife's life and the lives of any children they had, is what he did.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Do we know what his relationship with his wife is or what it was when they were living
together? I have no idea, do you? So far, the two women coming out in the open with their affairs with him, had them prior to his son being born and well before his marriage. Obviously he cares enough about the older "model" to have married her.

BTW...he only has one child
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. Bull shit.
You really do think women are idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. Well, Steph is now a lawyer, she can sue him if she wants. But it appears she really is quite fond
Edited on Sun Oct-04-09 02:29 AM by saracat
of Dave and has said so in the years since she worked for him.She wasn't a cjhild and they were both single.They remain friends. this didn't sound like harrassment to me, though the thought crossed my mind when the story broke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. And where are the sexual harassment suits? It all depends on the boss and on the
employee. You are assuming that he's being predatory and you don't have a clue about what really went on, as I don't.

I had an affair with a boss and it had nothing to do with power or his marking his territory, etc. It was about mutual attraction. It didn't last long but I worked with him and remained friends with him for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Would you have had an affair were he not your boss?
Can you honestly say that his power and station in life were not a contributor?

Kissinger was right - power is a strong aphrodisiac, whether you admit it or not.

You don't have to have an open harassment to create a hostile work environment. How, do you think, did your co-workers feel when they realize - yes, they knew - that you were having an affair with the boss? It create a toxic environment where other women feel that you get all the plum jobs or that, when there is a downturn, your job is safer because of the affair.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. And what didn't you understand when I said
'it had nothing to do with power or his marking his territory, etc. It was about mutual attraction.'?
As to my fellow employees? I had great relationships with All of them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. And that's all there is to it. No one has the right to judge here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. You have a bit of a hard-on for Letterman, don't you?
This is reaching Yukon Barbie/Trig silliness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. Exactly. I guess Letterman nuttiness will have to tide us over until
Palin's book comes out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow. LOL. n/t
Edited on Sun Oct-04-09 12:54 AM by Avalux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. No
the more to this story is coming from Halderman's attorneys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Regina is the mother of his son, not Stephanie. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. Who really gives a rat's ass??
Besides you, I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. Amen to that. Another Letterman thread to hide....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's Letterman. Not the grassy knoll. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. is Letterman gonna give me Medical Insurance? A 40 hr job?
if not, I'm not worried about it. he probably wont give anybody I know sex for that matter either.

Letterman ridiculed Dukakis and Mondale. He touted Bush 1 and loved Clitnot's NAFTA crap. I used to get frustrated w/ him so stopped watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. Actually
The truth is that Dave is not human. He is a visitor from the planet Pantaloon, disguised as a homely yet tall comedian from the midwest. His parents found the wreckage of his ship on their cornfield. While Dave disguise is very convincing, there are two Pantaloonian features he is incapable of concealing: The gap teeth and goofy hair. He was sent here in a pant-shaped escape pod by his parents, Adele and Fred Astaire. Pantaloon had suffered a cataclysmic overload of a substance toxic to Pantaloonians - the mineral Idiotron. You'll notice that Dave becomes testy and impatient whenever he is exposed to Idiotron. (This is another clue to his other-worldy origin).

Joe Halderman discovered this when he was living with Dave's former romantic interest, Stephanie Birkitt. Being an honorable man, Halderman stole dairy pages and photographs from Ms. Birkitt. Halderman simply wanted the world to know that aliens had invaded Earth in the form of goofy-haired, gap-toothed comedians. Naturally, we can't expect Mr. Halderman to go unrewarded for his brave, brave efforts. It's perfectly understandable that he would attempt to extort money from Mr. Letterman because that's what honorable men like Halderman do - steal their girlfriend's personal possessions, use them to extort money and write screenplays about it.

Meanwhile, who knows that dangers await us as long as the Idiotron levels on Earth remain unchecked?

Stay tuned...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marew Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
13. We have more important things to think about.
Most of us could not care less!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. Yes and no
It has been almost 20 years since Anita Hill caused many of us to take a look at the work environment. What many of us thought were just harmless flirts were, in fact, a form of harassment.

Especially with so many losing their jobs every day, with employers using the economic conditions to get rid of "troubled" employees, of older, higher paid ones, this could be an excuse.

I am not saying that Letterman fired or threatened to fire any woman who said NO, but we really don't know how many women did lose their jobs because they did not respond to "harmless flirt."

Men - and women - in a controlling position should not have an affair with a subordinate. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. If there was any quid pro quo involved, it is harassment
"Sleep with me or I'll fire you", that sort of thing.

Too many people (even here) thing sexual harassment is a-ok. You know, "boys will be boys" or whatever. It can potentially create a hostile workplace, which nobody can seriously really want, can they? Certain things are always, without exception, WRONG in the workplace: dirty jokes, porn (unless I guess you are in that business), naughty pictures, comments about appearances (positive or otherwise), etc. Of course there are other forms of workplace harassment: ethnic jokes or comments, etc.

I think sleeping with your boss, coworkers, or people you supervise, need to be on the forbidden list. It is just pretty fucking stupid at best and actionable at worst. In a non-showbiz world, he would and should be fired.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. I am sure that there never was a quid pro quo. Not outright.
But it can always be implied. Would they sleep with "Dave" if he were not the boss? Would women in the workforce sleep with any "Dave" if he is not in a supervisory position?

Yes, I agree with you. Sleeping with your boss, co-workers, even customers and suppliers should be forbidden. This is why many places prohibit any office romance and others draw the line when there is a supervisory relations. And, too often, when one of them has to leave the job, it is the woman.

It is really sad that in a supposedly progressive place like DU, people do not see it this way. Wonder what they would have said about Clarence Thomas pointing to Anita Hill that here was a pubic hair on his Coke can, especially if Thomas were a liberal judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Pubic hair on Coke Cans and Long Dong Silver references are not "harmless flirts" and never were
You seem to be making a lot of baseless assumptions about Letterman when you try to equate him with Clarence THomas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. this does seem like quite a stretch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
honkydonkey Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
14. blah
This ranks right up there with Jon and Kate for me. I honestly don't care. There's bigger fish to fry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
15. Had a lot of coffee tonight?
damn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. At birth I was endowed with 12 quarts of outrage and...
6 gallons of give-a-shit.

I am now down to several teaspoons of each, and prefer not to use them on Letterman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
18. What is that disgusting sewer smell?
It's not coming from Letterman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
24. No. But it did occur to me that Regina also worked for the show and
would also have been one of the women he was involved with.It could have been Steph and Regina. It could have been that he didn't what compromising photos of his now wife released.the idea of "getting Steph pregnant deliberately" is absurd. David's wife is much younger than he is and likely could have had her own child. David likely did not want to be married , nor did his wife.They were together for 23 year and didn't marry till the child was six years old. Gimme a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
27. I think Regina may have decided that remaining childless was a threat to her
and once Harry was on the way, the affair with Stephanie ended.

Regina was "Stephanie" in the mid 80's, and may have seen her as a potential "replacement" for her, at some point. Perhaps Harry was the "glue" that kept Dave close to home and reassessing his future, as family-man Dave:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
28. Bill and Hillary had problems that should have been kept out of the
press as none of our business. John and Elizabeth, not our business. Letterman the same.

Get a hobby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
36. MYOB that's my advice
or MYOFB for the hard of comprehending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
38. Seriously? I could care less.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC