Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boll weevil Democrats: precursors to the Blue Dogs?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 08:23 PM
Original message
Boll weevil Democrats: precursors to the Blue Dogs?
Nonetheless, a bloc of conservative Democrats, mostly Southerners, remained in the United States Congress throughout the 1970s and 1980s (Conservative Coalition). These included Democratic House members as conservative as Larry McDonald, who was also a leader in the John Birch Society. During the administration of Ronald Reagan, the term "boll weevils" was applied to this bloc of conservative Democrats, who consistently voted in favor of tax cuts, increases in military spending, and deregulation favored by the Reagan administration.

"Boll weevils" was sometimes used as a political epithet by Democratic Party leaders, implying that the boll weevils were unreliable on key votes or not team players.

Most of the boll weevils eventually retired from office, or in the case of some such as Senators Phil Gramm and Richard Shelby, switched parties and joined the Republicans.


<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boll_weevil_Democrats>

Hmmmm...voted with Republicans more than progressives, favored deregulation and tax cuts, as well as expansions in the military-industrial complex, and generally opposed progressive policies?

They may not be as concentrated in the South today, but the boll weevils are still among us. They just go by more innocent names like "Blue Dogs."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sam Nunn was as useful to Ronnie Ray-Guns as a dem as he is now.
Nancy didn't do to bad for Shrub ,it's their Votes that Denote them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agreed. Democrats are afriad to be Democrats.
This should be the party of FDR, not the party of Sam Nunn and Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You said Bill not me ,not that there aren't a few common bonds. But
I agree FDR, JFK ,RFK Hell be more like Theodore Roosevelt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wse tolerated them because early on, they stood with Dems on
the cultural issues, i.e., Abortion.

Now they are often Pro-life and even on cultural issues
vote with Republicans.

They try to brag about being fiscal conservatives. Yes, as
long as it does not hurt their masters. Business.

I am having a hard time determining exactly what makes them
Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well, they're Democrats In Name Only. There's a good reason they're called boll weevils
They destroy us from the inside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Insipid little Critters.
Edited on Tue Oct-06-09 08:52 PM by orpupilofnature57
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC