Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wake County (Raleigh and suburbs) voted for resegregated schools tonight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 09:22 PM
Original message
Wake County (Raleigh and suburbs) voted for resegregated schools tonight
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6150533/#

Wake County voters gave a thumbs-down Tuesday to assigning local students based on socioeconomic factors by electing candidates to the Board of Education who oppose the controversial policy.

Chris Malone won the District 1 seat on the school board, while Deborah Pickett won in District 7 and Debra Goldman took District 9.

John Tedesco was leading in the District 2 race, with incumbent Horace Tart a distant third. But Tedesco lacked the majority of votes that would preclude a runoff next month.

All four candidates were endorsed by community groups like WakeCARES and the Wake Schools Community Alliance because they said they were willing to change the district's student assignment policies to favor neighborhood schools.

end of quote

It is a very sad outcome to say the least. Our schools are by no means perfect but for a large, urban school system we are better than most. Now we could go the way of places like Cleveland, Buffalo, and Chicago. These low turnout elections matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. I didn't think they could legally do that, dsc. If it's true, I'm sorry to hear it.
Two steps forward, two steps back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I live in carboro. This addresses the act
of distributing students around to maintain a percent of each school on free lunch. This indirectly correlates to race. The net impact is that some students are bussed to "better" schools and get access to better resources. It also served to hide disproportionate achievement by minorities in the stats of other students. So the root cause of dropout and low performance is not addressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I figured there was an ulterior motive but I still think it's illegal as hell.
P.S. I live in Chappa Heel and work in Carrburr.

:hi:

Howdy neighbor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 09:56 PM
Original message
It could go either way, hopefully it will address
people who need help directly rather than moving them around the proverbial balance sheet. It all depends on how they choose to deal with real issues.

I do love the area, best place i have ever lived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. I live here and have friends in Mecklenburg county system. They did this years ago
it forces the school systems to address student performance instead of distributing them through the system to hide them until they drop out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. we out perform Mecklenburg in every single solitary statistic
except last year we had a very slightly higher drop out rate for our lower income students. We have better SAT scores, better EOC scores, a lower racial divide in our scores, and do that spending less per pupil than Mecklenburg does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. So, am I right? Isn't this illegal?? I thought we had a major court ruling against this years
ago over exactly this kind of bullshit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. that ruling was about race
this is about economics. Economic status isn't a protected class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hopefully it will be used to
help those who need it rather than burying them in the stats. regardless of race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe, and maybe it assures the subalterns a place at the table. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC