Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama faces a TOUGH decision on Afghanistan.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 05:18 PM
Original message
Obama faces a TOUGH decision on Afghanistan.
He is between a rock and a hard place,
though it IS a situation of his own making.


He has already committed himself and the Democratic Party to "winning" in Afghanistan.
He has already escalated Military Forces by 21,000 (and nobody knows how many additional "Private Consultants").
He is already committed to building the BIGGEST "Embassy" the WORLD has EVER seen in Islamabad.
(Yes...even bigger and more expensive than the Green Zone).

Problem is, the latest best military estimates is that it will take over 600,000 troops to "win".
(400,000 trained Afghanis + 200,000 "Coalition" forces).
McChrystal is going to ask for 40,000 more because that is all he thinks he can get.
(Bill Moyers, 2 weeks ago)

Afghanistan was supposed to be the war that made sense, if any war can be said to make sense. That's where the masterminds behind 9/11 were hiding. End of story.

Eight years later, and we're still there, at a cost exceeding 220 billion dollars. More than 1400 have been killed among American troops and our NATO allies. This week, a classified report from by the American commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal was leaked to the press, a report that called for as many as 40,000 additional U.S. troops, without which, the General wrote, our effort, "...will likely result in failure." If approved by President Obama, our military force there would escalate to more than 100,000.

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/09252009/transcript4.html




NOW:
Does Obama follow the advice of the Generals which he has pledged to do, and send sufficient forces to "win" a war that is already increasingly unpopular and expensive, AND say "goodbye" to The Left Wing (and many moderates too)?

OR

Does he say NO, and keep fighting what can only be a lingering failed war with insufficient troops, AND reap the wrath of the Right Wing for going against The Generals?

Damned if he does....Damned if he doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. And it is not going to get any easier by postponing the decision.
Edited on Wed Oct-07-09 05:19 PM by BrklynLiberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. He wanted the job.
He knew the problems going in. It's not like this was some big ass surprise.




TG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC