Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O'Donnell (Countdown): Only a "triggered" public option to be considered...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:52 AM
Original message
O'Donnell (Countdown): Only a "triggered" public option to be considered...
So said Lawrence O'Donnell on last night's Countdown. He said it was clear that the White House was going to make the basic rule in reconciling the bills that whatever compromise is crafted has to be something Snowe would support. Since she wants a "trigger" plan (that would make it impossible to ever invoke -- my comment), that means that anything stronger than a trigger will be discouraged by the White House and congressional Democratic leadership.

Don't know how accurate O'Donnell is on this, but he has a pretty good track record in the past.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. A trigger is a joke.
It is just a way to push it down the road where they think they might be able to kill it.

But they get to choose. If nothing else there would be some comedy in such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. agree with you completely - but with a little lipstick, we will be reading
many congratulatory posts right here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Lawrence O'Donnell has been wrong before.
He poo poo'd the idea of any kind of Public Option early on in the process. I remember getting very discouraged listening to him, because I know that HE knows Senate prodecure better than maybe anyone else on the air right now.

The fact that a huge majority of American really really want a Public Option may yet change his expectations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. so how was he wrong . . . this is some kind of PO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. I hope Mr. Wrong is wrong again.
Edited on Wed Oct-14-09 05:19 AM by FlaGranny
Sometimes I feel he is a plant to get us riled up. He usually gets ME riled up nearly every time he's interviewed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. A trigger that never gets pulled, I'm sure the insurance industry is delighted at the prospect.
WTF is this, with a 60/40 Senate majority we form a committee of 3 Democrats and 3 Republicans to put this legislation together? And now it has to pass a smell test by one person in Congress, a Republican?

:wtf:

Here's an idea for an actual compromise: No strong public option without a trigger, no individual mandate whatsoever. See how the insurance lobby likes that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Strangely, my vote in 2010 (and beyond)...
...will be triggered at the exact same time as the public option.

I suspect that I am not alone in that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC