Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

USMC finally gets off its ass: Corps to ban recruits with prior sex offenses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:14 AM
Original message
USMC finally gets off its ass: Corps to ban recruits with prior sex offenses


Recruits watch Marines of the Battle Color Detachment, Marine Barracks Washington, Washington, D.C., perform at Parris Island. The Corps is planning to cut the number of recruiters and tighten standards for incoming recruits now that it has achieved its expansion to 202,000 active-duty Marines.


Corps to ban recruits with prior sex offenses
By Dan Lamothe - Staff writer
Posted : Tuesday Oct 13, 2009 21:04:33 EDT

With the expansion to 202,000 active-duty Marines now complete, the Corps will cut recruiters in the coming year and ban anyone with a past sex offense from joining the service, Recruiting Command’s top officer said.

Maj. Gen. Robert Milstead said in early October that the Corps will no longer allow anyone with a felony or misdemeanor sexual offense to enlist, even if there are extenuating circumstances, and will admit far fewer recruits who perform poorly on the Armed Services Vocational Battery test.

“We’ve tightened up for this year. We just won’t take them,” Milstead said of those with a previous sex offense. “It’s just not worth the churn. Even if it’s a great guy, it’s just not worth it on this playing field with the media. We just don’t need it.”

From October 2006 through June 2008, the Corps allowed eight recruits to enlist with felony sex convictions on their record, according to statistics released by the Marine Corps through the Freedom of Information Act. Milstead said that in some of those cases, the Corps decided to give a recruit a second chance after discovering the crime involved an 18- or 19-year-old having a romantic relationship with a girl who fell short of the legal age of consent. That won’t be happen anymore, he said.

The decision is part of an adjustment to refine recruiting across the Corps. Next year, the mission is to find 35,868 enlisted recruits, the fewest in at least five years. Aided in part by robust retention, the Corps got so far ahead of the curve in meeting the 202K recruiting mission that it was reduced from more than 40,000 to 36,696 during 2009, Marine officials said.


Rest of article at: http://marinecorpstimes.com/news/2009/10/marine_recruiting_101309w/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. ...
Edited on Wed Oct-14-09 05:21 AM by Solly Mack
"Even if it’s a great guy, it’s just not worth it on this playing field with the media. We just don’t need it.”

Not worth the media attention to recruit sex offenders? Snort.

Oh..don't get me wrong...not enlisting sex offenders is a good thing ( a sort of a "DUH" thing )...but the reason should be because they're sex offenders & pose a threat other marines...and not the reason given (media attention)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. this will last only as long as recruitment goas are met
fall short, back to letting anyone in . . . even the criminals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Might last a long time as the economy ain't getting better any time soon.
All of the branches filled their enlistment quotas too easily this past year. The economic draft has
been a phenomenal success. I'm headed back to DC this spring. And not on a weekend.
This warrants mass civil disobedience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. next year is an election year - I expect to see a lot of job creation beginning in the Spring
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Due to the slumping economy and massive unemployment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm curious about how little it takes to be a sex offender
Is a 17 year old who dated a 14 year old while he was a senior and she was a freshman in high school included (presuming they went all the way)? What about a guy who was seen pissing on a tree in the woods, and charged with exposing himself?

No, I'm not defending rapists and pedophiles, but in as puritan a country as ours, there are a lot of things you can get labeled a sex criminal for, that have nothing to do with your basic character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Well, at least they're safe from gays.
Thank goodness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC