Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Isn't the whole subprime, mortgage based derivatives scam worth a RICO RACKETEERING prosecution?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:04 PM
Original message
Isn't the whole subprime, mortgage based derivatives scam worth a RICO RACKETEERING prosecution?
RICO is a federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization and was used to prosecute Wall Street scammer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RICO#Michael_Milken">Michael Milken and used to threaten Drexel Burnham Lambert for insider trading.

Let's see, in this case, they gave people mortgages they knew they could never pay back, invented an investment deal based on that, which like a Ponzi scheme was doomed to collapse eventually, and those in the know probably pulled out right before the house of cards collapsed on the rest of us. That sounds like a classic "pump and dump" straight out of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiler_Room_%28film%29">BOILER ROOM.

Couldn't you make a RICO case for prosecuting everyone from the person who approved the doomed loan to the guys who packaged the derivatives to the investment banks who kept the whole thing going?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just why do you think that theyhad Homeland Security watching
Every move that Elliot Spitzer made? Until they finally caught him making a wire payment for a high priced call girl and brought him down.

A RICO is not going to come from the Obama administration as President Obama is being advised by Tim "I love me some derivatives" Geithner.

Derivatives, if you happen to be on the side of the equation setting up the equation, are like totally cool. You get to plunder through many pension fund bank accounts and it makes Bernie Madoff's 60 billion scam look like a kid's allowance.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Don't forget Carol Lam
She was singled out because she was going after corporate fraud. The following example may not be about mortgages, but well illustrates a pattern of favoritism to corporations over "little people"


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carol_Lam

Healthcare fraud



Lam was an expert in prosecuting healthcare fraud, having authored a 954-page textbook on the subject.<11> As U.S. Attorney, Lam took an interest in the case of San Diego's Alvarado Hospital Medical Center, which was owned by Tenet Healthcare Corporation, the nation's second-largest hospital chain.<12> In 2002, government agents raided the hospital. In June 2003, the hospital's chief executive, Barry Weinbaum, was indicted on one count of conspiring to violate the federal anti-kickback statute and seven counts of offering and paying illegal remuneration. The hospital and a Tenet unit were indicted a month later.<13> On February 17, 2005, a mistrial was declared when the jury failed to reach a verdict. Lam personally prosecuted the case in a second trial; after seven months in the courtroom and a record of four months of jury deliberation, the judge declared another mistrial on April 4, 2006.<14>

Tenet settled. Denying that it paid kickbacks to doctors for referrals of patients to Alvarado, Tenet paid $21 million to the government, agreed to shut down Alvarado Hospital<15> and admitted that the case has led to "significant reforms" at hospitals around the country and that the company had been "distressed" to learn of "excessive payments" to some doctors.<16>


Lots more at Wikipedia as well as Google. Now we're in the middle of a Health Care debate, but it seems the gov made out okay in this case, they got $21M in fines, and now Health Insurance has its lobbyists out in force.

What about the nickel-and-diming that occurred over years before that by Medical-Insurance-hospital industry against "consumers". Was there justice for many little people that overpaid for years in the 21M fine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Very good information. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Those who wrote and passed the legislation that enabled this should be prosecuted first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Funny thing is - if you used that criteria, you would still end up
Edited on Thu Oct-15-09 01:56 AM by truedelphi
With a subpoena and maybe a warrant and cozy jail cell for Mr Geithner. He headed the New York Fed and had his fingers in a lot of the bowls wherein the current funancial pie pieces have originally come from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. +1
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. A variation of Leona Hemsley's advice comes to mind. She said
something like "only little people pay taxes".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm struggling to find the illegality in most of what you're talking about.
The whole problem was that most of that shit was legal in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. 2004 : FBI Warns of "Epidemic" of Mortgage Fraud.
Contrary to what you may now be hearing from the Justice Dept. Fraud is illegal.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/09/17/mortgage.fraud/

Assistant FBI Director Chris Swecker said the booming mortgage market, fueled by low interest rates and soaring home values, has attracted unscrupulous professionals and criminal groups whose fraudulent activities could cause multibillion-dollar losses to financial institutions.

"It has the potential to be an epidemic," said Swecker, who heads the Criminal Division at FBI headquarters in Washington. "We think we can prevent a problem that could have as much impact as the S&L crisis," he said.

Officials noted mortgage industry sources have reported more than 12,000 cases of suspicious activity in the past nine months, three times the number reported in all of 2001.

Officials said mortgage fraud is one prominent aspect of a wider problem of fraud aimed at financial institutions. The FBI said action has been taken against 205 individuals in the past month in what it described as the "largest nationwide enforcement operation in FBI history directed at organized groups and individuals engaged in financial institution fraud."


Epidemic levels of mortgage fraud at the retail level. But what's really driving it? EPIC levels of fraud at the wholesale level.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-k-black/the-two-documents-everyon_b_169813.html

The rating agencies never reviewed samples of loan files before giving AAA ratings to nonprime mortgage financial derivatives. The "AAA" rating is supposed to indicate that there is virtually no credit risk -- the risk is equivalent to U.S. government bonds, which finance refers to as "risk-free." We know that the rating agencies attained their lucrative profits because they gave AAA ratings to nonprime financial derivatives exposed to staggering default risk. A graph of their profits in this era rises like a stairway to heaven . We also know that turning a blind eye to the mortgage fraud epidemic was the only way the rating agencies could hope to attain those profits. If they had reviewed even small samples of nonprime loans they would have had only two choices: (1) rating them as toxic waste, which would have made it impossible to sell the nonprime financial derivatives or (2) documenting that they were committing, and aiding and abetting, accounting control fraud.


The Obama Administration won't bring these cases, not because they can't be made, but because they would be "class warfare". Obama doesn't do class warfare, except against the working class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. The advantage of owning the legislature; you get to make your theft legal.
The banking system itself would be criminal except for the fact that they cut the kings in on the take. In a sane world of people it is straight-up fraud.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes.
Great idea! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. The answer is: Yes.
This would be a perfect RICO case. There was more than enough knowing, intentional, fraudulent, behavior to go around, from the people who originally processed the loans, to the people bought and bundled the loans, to the rating agencies that gave the securities ridiculous ratings, to those who sold the securities.

Back before he was elected, I (naively) hoped that since Obama understood the legal implications of this massive fraud, he'd see that there was a massive number of prosecutions. Instead, we got almost zilch.

When the people who you'd be prosecuting control the purse-strings, the prosecution's not going to get very far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. hey, if you can take the most powerful nation to war for no reason with no consequence....
you're talking small potatoes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. We are looking forward on the fraud
like we are looking forward on everything else.

Some of these people are now good friends with the President, and who send their friends to jail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Obama calls Tim Geithner his "Good buddy."
And apparently Obama's mom and Geithner's dad worked together at the Ford Foundation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I wish I could use that defense on my parking tickets and taxes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC