Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I may be wrong, you may be right...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:15 PM
Original message
I may be wrong, you may be right...
but I do think that they're going to run Liz Cheney for President in 2012. I also think the media suspects the same, i.e. giving her the exposure she needs to get her/darth's opinions out there. The extreme right would love this, namely Faux's Billy Kristol and since Sara has pretty much blown her chances, the repubs want a "first" something, anything. First woman POTUS Cheney would make her old man's heart/machine zip right along. She's a nasty bit of work, never has her facts straight and the media seems to bow down to her. Yep, I could be wrong and you may be right in thinking I'm crazy on this but it will be interesting to see what comes of my radical thinking here. She does fit the profile of a repug perfectly....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. she's obviously hateful enough and can lie with a straight face...she's perfect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Her ability to spread the bile is 500% better than her Alaskan sister.
Yes Mz.Liz could be the one. If Americans want 100% war 24/7/365 she would be the candidate. I would have to poke my eardrums out before attempting to listen to the debates. Liz Cheney exemplifies the perfect form of evil packaged in a woman's body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks guys. I figured I'd hear a "What! You crazy?"....lol...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Hardly. The Republics are desperate. They'd run Mr. Ed if they thought he might win.
I would also hope President Obama will no longer be so polite at the 2011 debates, regardless of what or who they choose to run. It would be refreshing to hear him use the word "lie" against a Republican opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. holy crap, that would be scary because she is so beyond the
Edited on Wed Oct-14-09 01:27 PM by jonnyblitz
pale insane. that being said, i can picture a certain low information segment of USA/Americans being attracted to her, with her wingnut lesbian sister at her side to add to the wierdness of it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. If that happens, Obama would be running against Bush/Cheney
There's so much to go after.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah, but does anyone like her or identify with her?
Sarah has her followers swooning over her because they think she's one of them. Who in the world likes the Cheneys? They aren't fun people and I don't think they have many friends, though they may have supporters.

They may try, but I think Liz Cheney will just end up rubbing everyone the wrong way.

On the other hand maybe they're setting her up as Vice President. Just like Daddy, with every intention of acting just like him since he'll be telling her what to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't think you're crazy. Now, I may be crazy for thinking
she AND vader were going to run as team during their non stop jibber jabber earlier this year,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. I remember a lot of feminist silliness back in the 70s
about how women in positions of great power were going to bring about fundamental changes in the way the country operates, making it more humane and nurturing, because of course women were far superior to that male 50% of the human race.

The women who were allowed to succeed into positions of great power, alas, were generally of the Schlafly, Cheney and Palin variety, women who were happy to use everything we fought for but determined no other woman would be able to use it.

I'm almost grateful these high profile female monsters exist, it relieved us of an awful burden. Being the morally superior half of the human race was exhausting as well as impossible.

Lynne Cheney would put an almost human face on the GOP, though, and she's a neocon's dream, someone who would probably allow her husband to dictate much foreign policy while her domestic policy would maximize cruelty toward the American people in the name of capitalist purity.

Fighting her would have to include fighting her husband, something that will make many feminists uncomfortable, but is entirely appropriate in a right wing marriage where lip service at least is paid to female submission.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I'm talking Liz, the daughter not Lynne the wife. My other question to
you...."Feminist silliness of the 70s"?????? I was one of those feminists and didn't think of it as silly at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Ah, my bad, I get all the right wing drones confused
especially in that family. The bad seed seems to breed true, doesn't it?

As for silliness, it was silly. We produce monsters, too, and our monsters are the only ones the PTB allow to succeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. That 'feminist silliness' is what got women where we are today
I am grateful to each and every one of those who pioneered feminism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Perhaps you need to reread the post
because I clearly defined the silly part.

The operative word, in case you still can't manage to understand, is "part."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. This is the part of your post I found offensive
"I remember a lot of feminist silliness back in the 70s

about how women in positions of great power were going to bring about fundamental changes in the way the country operates, making it more humane and nurturing, because of course women were far superior to that male 50% of the human race."

It may be that you just did not express yourself clearly. Maybe you did not mean to call the early feminists 'silly' and state that they believed they were 'far superior to the male 50% of the human race.' But that is how it came through to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Oh, right, all 70s feminists were true giants
who did everything right and never had bad hair days or went to the bathroom.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I'm just not seeing your logic on this issue.
Your response doesn't make sense to me. Are you high?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. What is this, a new Billy Joel song?
"I may be wrong, I may be crazy
Well it just may be a lunatic they're looking for...
I may be wrong but for all you know I may be right"

You gotta be kidding. Tonya Harding for President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I swear, that damned song has been in my head all day. Glad
you noticed. I do love the Billy Joel....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. If they think running Spawn of Satan is a good idea....
then they're far more delusional than I thought. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. I don't think so, and here's why...
...she has never been elected to any office, anywhere, as far as I can tell. Even the looniest of the loonies expect their Presidential candidates to have some experience in running and winning elections. (not that they care too much *how* those elections are "won"...).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I've seen a lot of things happen that I never thought would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC