Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Irony is dead: Limbaugh threatens legal action over false statements

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:15 PM
Original message
Irony is dead: Limbaugh threatens legal action over false statements
http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910140027


Irony is dead: Limbaugh threatens legal action over false statements

October 14, 2009 3:17 pm ET by Eric Boehlert


Actually, the fact-free talker is threatening to sue journalists who report what Limbaugh claims are falsehoods regarding him. Hmm, suddenly, Limbaugh doesn't like being on the other end of misinformation? Suddenly he's demanding folks back up and source all their information, in a way that he almost never does?

Good to know.

Meanwhile, is this a precedent Limbaugh really wants to create for his show? Does the chronic misinformer really want to start a movement where those who are demeaned by his lies are encouraged to contract their attorneys and threaten legal action against the host until he retracts his statements. (If so, Limbaugh's gonna have to put more lawyers on retainer.)

I love how Limbaugh reflexively reaches for the phone to call his lawyers when people say things about him that might be inaccurate. But when Limbaugh spends hour after hour behind the microphone concocting whatever version of reality strikes him that day, all that misinformation is protected by the right-wing notion of free speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. This should be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is he looking for the ACLU to represent him again?
Edited on Wed Oct-14-09 03:23 PM by lpbk2713



Limbaugh is the indisputable King of all Douchebags.






WAAAH!! No fair!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:17 PM
Original message
He'll be as successful as O'Lielly suing Al Franken.
Sue them, Rush...PLEASE!! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah, I say DO IT! Open the door for countless lawsuits which actually have legs! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Poor rush
Stupid fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe the Jeff Christie stuff will come out
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let me get this right
Edited on Wed Oct-14-09 03:19 PM by NewJeffCT
he is threatening to sue people who truthfully point out his lies? Let me guess - he's also for tort reform and will denounce frivolous lawsuits.

:crazy: :silly: :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. This SOB needs to be investigated regarding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Maybe he joined with Glen Beck
in raping & murdering a young girl in 1990?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Does he know the legal definition of discovery? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is the same fat pig named Limbaugh who, last I heard, was off to the Dominican
Republic to illegally fuck little boys while taking Viagra to great excess, along with Oxycontin???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corpseratemedia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. one little viagra
one poor third world child-sex haven,

so much trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bring it, Rush! Bring it!
It's all on YouTube.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hope that he wins his case and thus opens his ass (sorry for the visual) up for
everybody that he lied about to come forward ...

remember, he is not a journalist, he keeps reminding us he's an entertainer and thus shouldn't be able to protect his sources ... if they were anything other than emissions from his own ass ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'd love for this to go to trial.
If I were the defense attorney, my closing argument would be an endless compilation of every lie he's ever told about someone, and nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. He's a public figure: I think he'd need to establish both falsehood and malice
and he'd need to show harm

Given his long history of ugly comments, he can scarcely argue that malice motivates a reporter who reports Limbaugh's uttered yet another nasty racist remark and he can scarcely claim damage to his reputation

If he goes to court, he might get $1 in damages -- but I doubt it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. BRING IT ON CHILD-FUCKER!!!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. If we sue Rush, he's entertaining, so we cant. If he sues US, he's not?
Suddenly he's not an entertainer. Why does it matter to misrepresent an entertainer's act. Is that some sort of special national security issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. *boom* MY IRONY METER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. Discovery phase should be entertaining.
Rush will have to prove he can identify a falsehood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. How could anyone ever libel that slovenly tub of bad news?
It's not possible to harm him, and the truth is always a defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. I thought yesterday he told Jamie Gangel he didn't care what others thought about him
I guess that was yesterday's message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC