ZombieHorde
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-14-09 03:41 PM
Original message |
Are companies legally obligated to maximize profits for the stockholders? |
|
If they are, could you provide a link to the law?
(This is for school.)
|
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-14-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The Directors of a public company have a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders, e.g.: http://www.shajlaw.com/media/reports/BoardofDirectorFiduciaryDuties.pdf
|
Nuclear Unicorn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-14-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message |
2. They have a fiduciary responsibility to act in the best interests |
|
of the stock holders. In other words the officers can only pay themselves what the stock holders approve etc.
I presume your question centers on a hypothetical: what if they spent more on worker's benefits in lieu of profit?
Is there a law preventing them from doing that?
No.
But there is a stockholder's vote. If the holders don't think their return is being maximized they can have the officers replaced.
|
Traveling_Home
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-14-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No - depends on their incorporating documents, Execs, Boards, shareholder's decisions..... |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-14-09 04:20 PM by Traveling_Home
Ben & Jerry's
|
ZombieHorde
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-14-09 07:45 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Thanks everyone, "fiduciary" was the key word for my searches. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |