Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wow! Dylan Ratigan just had the most amazing exchange with the TARP Inspector General!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 08:21 AM
Original message
Wow! Dylan Ratigan just had the most amazing exchange with the TARP Inspector General!
Edited on Wed Oct-21-09 08:22 AM by Phoebe Loosinhouse
About what a ripoff TARP was to the American public, how banks took the funds and basically gambled with it, the lack of moral hazard, the whole fallacy of "too big to fail", the little or no regulation and/or accountability, the complicity of Geitner, Paulson, how TARP was pretty much analogous to a guy robbing a bank with a machine gun, Dylan went on and on the the TARP Inspector General AGREED with pretty much everything he said! He did not equivocate, justify, try to change the subject, or use any other diversionary tactic. He pretty much could have said "You're right Dylan, the system is completely f!@#ed up."

It was an amazing exchange, really. If you get a chance to watch it, please try to.

I am really getting enthralled by the no holds barred approach of Ratigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dylan's Been A Pleasant Surprise
Considering he came out of the corporate snakepit of CNBC.

TARP only succeeded in preventing a total banking collapse that would have put far more people out of work and wiped out pensions and endowments that millions of others live on. But it succeded at a price and one that the bill is now coming due. Once this health battle is done, the focus needs to turn on reregulating Wall Street and shut down the gambling casino.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Neil Barofsky..."Bail Out Re-payment In Question"
(snip)
http://www.comcast.net/articles/finance/20091021/US.Bailout.Watchdog/


WASHINGTON — The man who watches over the $700 billion in government money given to banks and other institutions to avert a financial collapse said Wednesday he thinks it's too early to say how much will be repaid to the taxpayers.

Just as the Obama administration prepares to announce a new TARP-like program for small community banks, Inspector General Neil Barofsky said he believes that "it's unrealistic to think we're going to get all of that money back."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I called my mortgage Compnay and my Credit Card Company today.. and told them I wasn't going to pay because it was "Un-realistic"

I told the IRS I wasnt going to pay 'cause it was un-realistic.

Somehow... they ain't buying it.(sic)

Yet our government in Washington can get away with this?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes, that's who it was.
He was one of those guys completely comfortable in the face of uncomfortable facts, a fairly rare commodity in government. He showed a refreshing lack of bluster or defensiveness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. And our useless Democratic government could have bailed out
Wall Street AND made them accountable. Instead they threw money at them and let Wall Street CEO billionaires go back to re-inflate the bubble.

Just think how many hundreds of millions of real middle class jobs could have been created using those same TARP tax dollars. We would be all working and the economy would be robust. True, Wall Street would be very sucky but the real economy would be booming.

Right now we have an understated unemployment problem. Some economists have stated it is as high as 20%. That represents about 26 million people. How many people work on Wall Street? Well, several estimates say it is about 200,000 people.

So we saved 200,000 jobs instead of 24 million. Sounds like Republicon math to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apples and oranges Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. He's coming across like Lou Dobbs
a lot of disingenuous false outrage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think he's disingenuous or faking his outrage.
Lou Dobbs? Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think you took a wrong turn there somewhere
best go back and see where you went wrong before you embarass yourself really bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeroen Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. apples and oranges n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. Ratigan is the best guy on TV for deconstructing the financial crisis
as well as being of the belief that there's a lot more to come - well, he's right up there with Bill Moyers, anyway.

It's a real novelty to have someone well versed in finance to be asking tough questions to any and all and who is also not afraid to use words like "crime" "theft" "con" "scam" etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. I am convinced that Obama did not choose Geitner for Treasury.
He was told he who he needed at that position. And he did not question it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Who do you think told him to choose Geitner?
I always liked the canard that was passed around at the time that the derivatives, swaps, etc. were so incredibly complex that only a very few people (Geitner, Summers, etc.) understood their complexity.

In reality the opposite was true - they were incredibly simple and stupid. They allowed both participants and uninterested bystanders to bet on outcomes of unstable and unregulated financial products and to "insure" themselves against predictably bad outcomes with an insurance product that was not labelled as an insurance product becuase that would have required reserves and regulation.

We get it. It's not complex. What it is is a finacial swindle - 3 card monte played on the American taxpayers by the same people who set up the game in the first place. I think any good DA good make a good case for a RICO investigation of both our Congress and our financial institutions.

I think the smoking gun would be any institution that knowingly made bad loans, sold them and then bet against the bad loans they themselves made with a credit default swap. Too clever by half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Is that a gut feeling or do you know something we don't know kentuck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I think he chose Geithner for the same reason he chose Gates...
Just my gut feeling, but I think he was looking for someone that "knew" the system and Geithner was the number one choice. I think he took the advice of Bill Clinton and Larry Summers. He has looked to the Clinton Administration for guidance, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Why do you think that?
I've always thought he put Geitner in the job for the same reason that FDR put Joseph Kennedy over the SEC ... "Takes one to catch one,"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. Then he throws softballs to some Republican pond scum about ACORN
I don't like this Ratigan schmuck.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. K&R -- reminding myself to check the Dylan Rattigan clips later. //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC