LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-22-09 10:10 PM
Original message |
Rachel said something tonight about Bush never giving the NYT a second interview. |
BrklynLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-22-09 10:21 PM
Response to Original message |
1. They never gave an interview to the NYTimes at all during the 8 years of pres shit-for-brains admin. |
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-22-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
silverweb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-22-09 11:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Rachel Maddow has a well-deserved reputation for deep and thorough research. If she says Bush never gave the NY Times a second interview, then that's what happened.
I'm also very sure that the Times and/or members of the Bush administration would be jumping all over her by now if she was wrong, but all I hear are crickets.
Of course, you're always welcome to do your own deep and thorough research to try to disprove her.
|
MarjorieG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-22-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. What about Judith Miller, Iraq War promoter. Just behind the scenes intel, spoon-fed? |
silverweb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-22-09 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Did she do a NY Times published interview with Bush?
That's the question here, not whether one so-called reporter was colluding behind the scenes with Uncle Dick and Rummy.
|
MarjorieG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-23-09 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Thought interview/access was at question, not one on one with Bush, as rest of dinner guests not |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 03:52 PM
Response to Original message |