Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's Jan 20 2009...What would Ron Paul have done as President?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:09 PM
Original message
It's Jan 20 2009...What would Ron Paul have done as President?
Just got this from a FB friend:

"I'm not happy with either side. I'm for less national government involvement and more power going to the state legislatures. I'm against the thought process that something is broken, we need to fix it, we need to fix it now, let's get something to fix it, doesn't matter if what we are using to fix it isn't perfect, something needs to be done so let's just do it. I was against the bail outs and now I'm angry that the 'pay czar' is telling ceo's what their pay is going to be. What would make me happy? Ron Paul as president."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Canceled Medicare, Medicaid and unemployment insurance?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think the first thing he'd do is round up all the african americans and march them into the
private contractor run concentration camps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Welcome...to Rapture!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ended the recession immediately, disbanded Al-Qaeda -and everyone gets a free Corvette...
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You forgot the lapdance from all those girls in highschool that called their followers geeks.
n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Absolutely nothing
He would have been massively opposed in anything he wanted to do by an overwhelmingly Democratic Congress that did not agree with him on just about anything.

It would have been governmental paralysis on a massive scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Well, he believes government should do absolutely nothing
Edited on Fri Oct-23-09 12:25 PM by Jack Rabbit
Mission accomplished.

ON EDIT

Rest assured that Ron Paul would at least do nothing better than Gee Dubya did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Abolish the government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Realistically, not a whole lot...
He would've had a helluva time getting anything through the Democratic congress.

Most likely, he would have probably taken a hands off approach on the US economy and it would've forced congress' hand as the crisis spiraled even more out of control.

The stock market would have probably tanked beyond what it did in March. Unemployment probably would be well beyond the 9% (or whatever it is) now due to a lack of stimulus.

There would be no healthcare debate at all. There would be no global warming discussion. Basically, it would've been like the last eight years, but probably worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. The good news is that all the useless foreign occupations would be over
and marijuana would probably be legalized.

Bad news is that all government regulation and the public schools would have been abolished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. +1.

He probably would've abolished the Fed as well (good), but that is not worth destroying social safety net (which he would've probably done as well).


Meh on Ron Paul, to say the least - even though he is probably less evil than most republican politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democracyinkind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. The second coming of Ayn Rand!


...the original Orly Taitz...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. Ron Paul? Damned little
He'd have a hostile Congress, for one thing. He'd have canceled TARP and vetoed a stimulus bill, so the economy would be far worse. Forget about auto company bail outs and C4C, GM would be liquidating right now, hoping foreign companies would buy the bits and pieces. Oh, and forget about stem cell research; religion trumps science and compassion for that jerk. Reagan's gag rule for overseas family planning money would still be in force, also.

Unemployment would be higher, more banks would be failing, and states would be cutting vital services along with more jobs.

Once things got desperate, Congress would likely pass stimulus legislation over his veto, but they'd have to get really desperate. With Paul's ideological zealotry in force, they'd get desperate quickly.

Small government that only runs the military is a great idea for the super rich because the military is the only part of the government they make full use of, protecting their overseas corporations from overseas peasants.

Small government for everyone else means no services and no infrastructure. Think about that for a minute and think about what it would be like without decent roads, traffic lights, signage, firefighters, the postal service, police, libraries, schools, and no regulations in place to make sure our food, water and medicine are all safe.

Ron Paul is a man of privilege who has never thought of any of this and he is incapable of doing so. He would be an unmitigated disaster for everyone but the billionaires.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I like your post. Why have young people seemed to jump in with him? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Because 1. Liberals aren't cool: Southpark told them so.
2. Jaded bastards like to whine about how both parties are the same (and they aren't quoting Chomsky).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. He was against the wars that are killing them
In addition, youth lacks the life experience to realize that the rest of his message is a lot of libertarian hooey together with fundy repression of women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. I wonder if my fb friend is aware of his views on women. where can
I find some examples to show her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Paul is an isolationist, and would dismantle the American Empire
So the rich are not particularly fond of him either. I also don't like him because his economic ideas are terrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. Freedom for white males
And they'll have the guns to make sure women and minorities stay in their place. That's how I view the "Paulites".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I would have said "property owning white males"
but then I realized that most that most of them own nothing besides their large hentai collections which they keep in their basement dwellings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. Everyones for more state power until
they found out their state absolutely sucks at something they have power in. Who wants to live in the state that gets health care wrong, civil rights wrong, education wrong, housing wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. I feel you there. I'm in WV. *nt
Edited on Fri Oct-23-09 01:42 PM by goodboy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. ..or which protects sexist, racist, homophibic "values" .... ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billh58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. Paul would have
been under indictment for having pulled off the largest act of voter fraud in the history of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. Found a way to outlaw abortion
The guy is a disgusting knuckle-dragger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. really? I just don't understand why 20 and 30 somethings think he's their saviour (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NavyDavy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. apparently not enough of them.....hes a dumbass repuke, one
of the worst of the worst......imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. Moved the country further to the right . . .to the irresponsible Libertarian right ....
There are actually left wing libertarians, but you don't hear much from them ...

nicer people, tho--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipfilter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
29. The Libertarians wouldn't have anything to piss and moan about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC