Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 07:45 PM
Original message |
Why is the Stupak amendment even necessary? |
|
Doesn't the Hyde Amendment already settle that issue?
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 07:47 PM
Response to Original message |
|
it extends the ban to private insurance if someone gets any form of subsidy. it's a hideous imposition. Disgusting.
|
Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Thanks for the clarification |
|
Just another woman-hating amendment, like all antichoice legislation.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. yes, and it will pass. they've sold us down the river |
|
again and again and again.
|
JerseygirlCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
cbayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. HIdeous is exactly the right word to describe it. nt. |
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. What a crock. Why would it involve ALL PLANS? /nt |
JerseygirlCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Because he's one of a gang of anti-choice jerks |
|
who don't think women ought to be able to make their own medical decisions.
|
Hekate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Why? Because Roe vs. Wade still stands as law and they want to overturn it entirely. |
|
I can think of no other reason, because they just keep chipping away at it relentlessly.
Hateful *holes.
Hekate
|
PeaceNikki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Yes. They are using health care reform as an excuse to attempt to restrict access. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 06:30 PM
Response to Original message |