yodoobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:08 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Is healthcare a Civil right? |
|
Is healthcare a civil right?
I was a bit shocked today to see many on DU arguing that its not. Just curious what most folks here think.
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:13 PM
Response to Original message |
1. No 'everywhere but here' option. nt |
yodoobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
8. Well it either is, or it isn't Location doesn't matter |
|
as to whether its a right.
Location only matters on whether that right is recognized.
Everyone here would agree that freedom of speech is a civil right.
Thats true even in the most repressive regime, but it's just not recognized there.
|
derby378
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:13 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The question is actually if HEALTH INSURANCE a right, not HEALTH CARE |
|
Big whopping difference there.
Is robbing the poor to give to the rich a civil right?
|
Echo In Light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
yodoobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
11. No thats your question |
|
And its a quite reasonable one if you wanna start a thread on it. Point me to it and I'll join ya there.
My question is very simple.
Civil right? yes or no.
|
Ardent15
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:14 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Civil right? Health care is a HUMAN right. nt |
CurtEastPoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message |
5. When Oprah interviewed Danes about 'socialism', they said they see it as 'civilized', not socialisti |
|
That makes perfect sense. The US is supposed to be a civilized country.
|
cark
(179 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Absolutely NOT a right. |
|
Rights are not something you have to rely on others to provide TO you, it is a service. This is dumbing down what rights truly are. You can argue that it is the right thing for a compasionate society to provide, but it is not a right.
|
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. Right wing talking points, 46 posts, no profile.... |
JANdad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:19 PM
Original message |
Don't you freepers like to say freedom isn't free |
|
or some other bullshit like that? If that is the case then doesn't the military provide that right to you?
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
15. I agree with you that it is not a right to have HC provided by society |
|
That is technically an entitlement.
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
16. It's certainly a right enshrined in the EU Constitution |
|
Then again, what would Americans know about rights, these days? A couple of airplanes hit the twin towers and "poof" you throw away basic elements of your free society.
|
Uncle Joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
26. Doesn't the VI Amendment Right to have assistance for defense counsel De Facto require |
|
someone to provide something TO you?
"Rights are not something you have to rely on others to provide TO you, it is a service."
|
cark
(179 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
33. That is stretching it. |
|
True you have the right to a jury of your peers and the right to counsil. These are just provision to ensure your pre-eminate right to a fair trial. If you didn't have counsil you most likely wouldn't understand the laws and how they apply to you as you try defend yourself.
|
Uncle Joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
34. What about evidence to be used against you? n/t |
HamdenRice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
49. Interesting analogy but not quite. The key is understanding negative and positive rights |
|
Generally the Constitution provides "negative rights". That means that most rights fit the format of "the government cannot do X to you." "Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of the press" and so on. Almost all Constitutional rights are framed negatively.
"Positive rights" have been experimented with in Europe, South Africa and certain international covenants. They say, "The government must do X for you" -- for example, provide education or health care.
Ultimately, the right to counsel is actually a negative right. It is not that they have to provide counsel; it's that "the government can't try you for a crime unless you have counsel." For most of our history that was meant merely to mean that if you had and could afford a lawyer, they could not exclude your lawyer and make you face trial without one.
In the 60s, the SCOTUS went further and said it was meaningless to simply provide a right to counsel without actually providing counsel to poor defendants. But this positive right remains sketchy as a positive right. It's more along the lines that you can't be tried unless a lawyer is found for you one way or the other.
|
Uncle Joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #49 |
65. I see right to counsel as a totally positive right, some governments have tried their citizens |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 11:43 PM by Uncle Joe
without this right.
Being tried in and of it self isn't negative, it's a neutral, as a trial could be considered positive or negative, some people relish their day in court, and while being tried for a crime isn't positive as in being considered innocent, it isn't as negative as being executed or imprisoned by the state without a trial.
The right to counsel and Sixth Amendment in general must be considered in the same light as insurance against unjust trial and imprisonment, appointed counsel may not be in the same league as high priced legal representation but nonetheless it represents a floor of legal protection.
Apparently the wording of the Sixth Amendment suggests the Founders considered it a positive right, possibly as everything being relative, what came before them was much more brutal.
Article VI; "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which districts shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense."
I've looked up every definition of the word "enjoy" in the dictionary and can find no negative connotations.
I'm of the belief that if every American for so long as they live whether guilty of a crime or not can have guaranteed legal insurance spelled out as a civil right; not just of representation but of the entire process, then surely having every American; (the vast majority being innocent) covered with life saving medical insurance as a civil right by the state; (not profit driven corporations) isn't too much of a stretch for an advanced nation such as our own to consider; indeed we're behind most of the developed world in this regard, as in spite of leading in health care spending our ranking is dismal.
If an Amendment needs to be passed, I'm all for it, but if as you say Constitutional rights are almost always or can only be framed in the negative, then I believe approaching or obtaining the lofty goals as enshrined in the totally positive Preamble will be exceptionally illusory and frustrating for the American People as a whole; aka "perfect Union."
|
walldude
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
28. "Rights are not something you have to rely on others to provide TO you" |
|
LMFAO yeah tell that to a black man who wasn't allowed to vote. Or had to drink from a different fountain than whites. Or tell it to a gay couple that wants to marry but can't.
You are quite confused my friend.
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
31. You're not looking at it correctly |
|
LMFAO yeah tell that to a black man who wasn't allowed to vote. Or had to drink from a different fountain than whites. Or tell it to a gay couple that wants to marry but can't.
Those people all have the rights you mention.
Their rights have been infringed.
|
yodoobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
Egalitariat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
58. I kind of agree with the Freeper on his definition. Rights are not granted by government |
|
rather they were reserved for us in our Constitution - like the right to free speech, the right to assemble, or to bear arms.
I think most of us, however, are hoping for health care to become an entitlement - like Social Security or Medicare.
They are quite different in my mind -- rights and entitlements.
|
rapturedbyrobots
(364 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
that's like saying there is no right to education. there is. it is recognized as a basic human right. if you'd like...we can rephrase the question so it's more in line with you framing: the right to not die because you are poor.
|
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Seems that far too many believe that all the civil rights battles were over in 1964. |
Dreamer Tatum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |
9. If you have to rely on someone else to provide it to you, it's not a right nt |
hansberrym
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
36. Why not just make someone else provide HC for you, but call it a tax? |
|
If we call the premiums a tax, doesn't that make everything OK? Afterall, no one has a right to refuse paying taxes.
:-)
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |
12. The debate in Congress is not about whether or not health care is a civil right |
|
That's pretty much settled. Even most people who are opposed to reform wouldn't say it's not a civil right.
The question at hand is how much of an ENTITLEMENT should health care be, who is entitled, and how should that entitlement be paid for.
|
bikingaz
(110 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
61. so how much should others pay for my health care? |
|
what should be the minimum? You can't do anything about getting bad genes but what about irresponsible behaviors?
|
yodoobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #61 |
Xenotime
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |
13. It's in the preamble of the constitution.. |
cark
(179 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
24. Preamble is not part of the Constitutional Law |
|
It is the mission statement, not the the governing laws. The laws start at Article 1. The Articles contain the laws to achieve those ideals laid out in the preamble. Notice the words 'in order to' in the preamble, they are very important.
|
begin_within
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Health care is one of the benefits of the social contract |
|
at least in my way of thinking, if we are forcibly subjected to the restrictions of the states (in the general term: federal, state, county, city, etc.) AND in the course of our lives forced to pay taxes to those states, then there should be significant benefits to us the participants as compensation. One of the benefits should be health care. That's my view of it, rather than it being some kind of inalienable right that humans are born with by nature.
|
Dreamer Tatum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
lumberjack_jeff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
20. That's a better way of saying it. |
|
It may not be a human right, but it's certainly a reasonable expectation from the society which our labor has created.
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 05:33 PM by slackmaster
Having it subsidized with public money constitutes an entitlement.
|
KansDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Of course! It's in the Declaration of Independence... |
|
"Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"
It's difficult to have life and liberty, and be happy if you're in pain and suffering, or going broke trying to avoid them...
|
Dreamer Tatum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. Our rights are enumerated in the Constitution, not the D of I nt |
HamdenRice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
KansDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
27. "Charters of Freedom" |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 05:43 PM by KansDem
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are listed among the "unalienable rights" of man.
Therefore, healthcare is a civil right...
edited for clarification
|
KansDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
23. I believe the C, the D of I, and the B of Rs are referred to as the... |
|
"Charters of Freedom."
Therefore, freedom requires healthcare to be a civil right...
|
Dreamer Tatum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
|
Sorry. If other people have to provide something to you, you don't have a right to it. Rights are something you're born with, and which can only be infringed.
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
30. Not all of them are enumerated |
|
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
|
HamdenRice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |
21. No, it's not a right. Whether it is or not is an empirical question, not up for a vote. |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 05:32 PM by HamdenRice
And I assume you mean a fundamental civil right. There is no provision in the Constitution that grants health care as a right.
If there is, please just post that provision and you can end the debate.
In some countries, health care has been declared to be a Constitutional right. One of those countries is South Africa. The US is not one of those countries. It would be nice if we were one of those countries, but we are not.
OTOH, some state constitutions go further than the federal constitution in granting so called "economic" or "welfare" rights. The NYS Constitution, for example, makes housing a state constitutional right.
Also, an ordinary statute can create "statutory rights." They are rights under the statute, but the statute can be repealed, so it is not a fundamental right. So for, example, Medicare and Medicaid create health rights for qualifying individuals. But those are not universal rights, because they don't apply to everyone, and as mentioned above, they rely on statutes that create programs and are not constitutional or civil rights. For example, the federal forestry statute create statutory rights of logging companies under certain circumstances to log the national forests; that doesn't mean that logging companies have fundamental logging rights.
Health care does not have to be a "right" for a democratically elected government to decide to provide it universally. For example a clean environment is a great thing for us to strive for, but it is provided as democratic statute making, not as a right. Same with health care.
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
29. Our Constitution doesn't grant any rights |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 05:34 PM by slackmaster
All rights were presumed to already exist at the time it was written. All rights continue to exist except for those that have been curtailed through due process of law.
|
hansberrym
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
40. Yeah, but I've always had the right to make you pay for my insurance, I have |
|
been cutting you slack all these years, you should thank me.
:-)
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
48. No, your right to hit me up for health care coverage has been infringed |
HamdenRice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
43. That's a silly theory that no one in the real world of law subscribes to |
|
Rights are established in the Constitution and court cases.
"Where there's a right, there's a remedy." If you don't have a remedy, then you don't have a right.
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:43 PM
Response to Original message |
35. In other countries. Here you have the right to suffer and/or die |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 05:44 PM by mmonk
for lack of access due to lack of money or lose all your wealth.
|
Dreamer Tatum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
42. There is a difference between rights that we're endowed with |
|
and guarantees made as part of the social contract.
If we ultimately have UHC in the United States, it will be a guarantee under the conditions spelled out in the enacted law.
|
HamdenRice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
46. Interesting point -- sort of what I was saying above |
|
but to distinguish "statutory rights" from "fundamental rights" we tend to call the former "entitlements." Statutory rights or entitlements can be taken away, and as you say are provided "under the conditions spelled out in the enacted law."
|
Dreamer Tatum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
50. A civil right is a non political right granted by a government by virtue |
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
'from my dead cold hands' says it all.
Some 'mericans would rather be dead from lack of healthcare, than unarmed.
|
NashVegas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:44 PM
Response to Original message |
38. If Gov't Loans and Pell Grants Are Paying For It, One Might Say 'Yes' |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 05:44 PM by NashVegas
|
yodoobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
60. The funding is irrelevant to the question though |
|
its either a right,or its not.
|
optimator
(606 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message |
|
but it is necessary for equality and opportunity. health CARE not insurance
|
Lone_Star_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message |
44. Just because it should be a civil right does not make it one. |
|
It is however a human right and a social responsibility Americans should respect. Wishing really hard that every citizen in the US had equal access to affordable, quality healthcare does not make it a civil right of our country. That would actually require massive work and protest by the populous of this country to gain such a right.
Also, requiring citizens to pay private insurance companies to obtain health insurance is not an affirmation that healthcare is a civil right in the United States.
|
Orsino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message |
45. Obviously not--yet. n/t |
rapturedbyrobots
(364 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message |
52. Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights |
|
Article 25
Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.
|
ChicagoSuz219
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
53. Awesome, Blossom! Thanks for posting! nt |
Lone_Star_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
54. I don't think anyone was doubting that it was a human right |
|
That's pretty much a given. Well, unless you're a Republican that is.
|
stray cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message |
55. How much do you pay for your neighbors civil rights - 10-20% of your income? |
yodoobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #55 |
59. Look at your form 1040 for the answer |
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 07:36 PM
Response to Original message |
56. Yes. Our concept of "civil rights" is an evolving one. |
|
But as with slavery and now the death penalty, we will be the last hold out to recognize such.
|
etherealtruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 07:37 PM
Response to Original message |
57. Its a human right! n/t |
classysassy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:10 PM
Response to Original message |
63. This health care bill |
|
really says something about our country and the people in congress.I'll bet my last peso most of us treat our dogs better than we do our fellow citizens.Yes I am guilty too,take my three dogs to the groomer monthly,feed them food that a homeless person would consider great,but we can't or want demand that the law makers(some law breakers)are too busy accepting bribes to pass a humane law for the less fortunate among us.
|
Wizard777
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
64. It's more of a human right. But some of our civil rights encompass human rights. |
|
So I voted yes. But I would have liked the opportunity to vote for it being a human right.
|
madville
(743 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:42 PM
Response to Original message |
66. I think people are confusing it being a "right" with it being "free" |
|
Many things are "rights", even some specifically spelled out in the Constitution. But just because something is a "right" doesn't mean it should be free of cost. We do need health care reform to make those costs reasonable.
I could exercise my right to free speech be publishing a newspaper. That doesn't mean the government should subsidize or provide me with a newspaper at taxpayer expense so I can exercise that right.
I could exercise my right to keep and bear arms. That doesn't mean the government should provide me with a firearm to do so. I would have to purchase my own firearm with my own money even though it is a right.
Health Care costs should be affordable. Everyone has a "right" to health care but the cost is the problem. Bring the costs down and people will be able to exercise that right by their own means. Apparently soon we will also have the right to send money to the insurance companies under threat of legal trouble.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |