Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Laws Limit Options When a Student Is Mentally Ill, colleges can't tell parents child is mentally ill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 01:35 AM
Original message
Laws Limit Options When a Student Is Mentally Ill, colleges can't tell parents child is mentally ill
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/19/us/19protocol.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

Federal privacy and antidiscrimination laws restrict how universities can deal with students who have mental health problems.

For the most part, universities cannot tell parents about their children’s problems without the student’s consent. They cannot release any information in a student’s medical record without consent. And they cannot put students on involuntary medical leave, just because they develop a serious mental illness.

Nor is knowing when to worry about student behavior, and what action to take, always so clear.

“They can’t really kick someone out because they’re writing papers about weird topics, even if they seem withdrawn and hostile,” said Dr. Richard Kadison, chief of mental health services at Harvard University. “Most state laws are pretty clear: you can only bring students to hospitals if there is imminent risk to themselves or someone else, so universities are in a bit of a bind that way.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. You mean medical confidentiality is enforced for adults? SHOCKING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. and that's as it should be
college students are - almost always - legal adults. Their medical information is private.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. The guy's profile matched that of other shooters like the Columbine students.
Cho Seung-Hui was over twenty one so he was beyond his parent's legal control anyway. If the remarks by teachers and other students is at all accurate, his words and actions were of a troubled young man who could explode at any time. When this country is quick to label a possible terrorist anybody who "looks" Middle Eastern, or has a name like Hussein, or is of the Muslim faith, surely someone who has a history like this young man, which appears to mimic that of other shooters, should have raised an alarm for further investigation.

If this country had comprehensive affordable medical care, including mental health care, this guy might have been persuaded to voluntarily get help, and the shootings might have been prevented. At the very least, this young man would have been on a "watch" list and the authorities would have looked for him after the first shootings, so that the later shootings might have been prevented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Welcome aboard AdHocSolver!
Absolutely spot on. We've been shorting our domestic social infrastructure for years to pay for Bush's illegal war. Republicans hate to spend money on the stuff we need to make us a better society...their budget priorities prove it. Sadly, I expect to see more stories of people like Cho who fell through the cracks or couldn't get the medical help/counseling he needed. More guns and concealed weapons aren't the answer...more investment in the health and welfare of the American people is what we have to learn from this tragedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ends_dont_justify Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well said!
People decry the actions it would take to give people like cho needed medical help (or at the very least alert people to possible tendancies, if he didn't want to get better); but people are very fast to judge people based on personal prejaduice alone. The dark half in many people likes breaking rules, why not implement new rules that benefit the whole of society based on good conscience?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Most college students are 18+. If they were NOT college students, they'd be otherwise considered
Edited on Thu Apr-19-07 02:46 AM by WinkyDink
adults by EVERYBODY.

Parents of college students have to understand that the law recognizes AGE as the defining factor, not parental support or curiosity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irreverend IX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. Notify parents?
I don't see why colleges shouldn't simply expel students who are violently mentally ill. Refund their tuition if you want, but the fact of the matter is that people with severe, unresolved emotional problems have no business being in post-secondary education. We're not talking about a guy who wears a lot of black and writes poetry about death here. The guy's classmates were afraid of sitting in the same room with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. No they can't kick someone out because they're writing papers about weird topics.
But after they kill two people in their dorm they should put out an APB and hunt the violent criminal down. But instead the police declared it a domestic and hoped for the best. How many times have domestic murders or attempted murders turned into more violent attacks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC