Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For 6 Years-BUSH Admin Tried To Curb Election Turnout In Key States To Bolster GOP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 06:45 AM
Original message
For 6 Years-BUSH Admin Tried To Curb Election Turnout In Key States To Bolster GOP
Administration tried to curb election turnout in key states
Campaign against alleged voter fraud sought to bolster the GOP
By Greg Gordon
Mcclatchy-tribune
Originally published April 19, 2007

WASHINGTON // For six years, the Bush administration, aided by Justice Department political appointees, has pursued an aggressive legal effort to restrict voter turnout in key battleground states in ways that favor Republican political candidates, according to former department lawyers and a review of written records.
The administration intensified its efforts last year as President Bush's popularity and Republican support eroded heading into a midterm battle for control of Congress, which the Democrats won.

Facing nationwide voter registration drives by Democratic-leaning groups, the administration alleged widespread election fraud and endorsed proposals for tougher state and federal voter identification laws. Presidential political adviser Karl Rove alluded to the strategy in April 2006 when he railed about voter fraud in a speech to the Republican National Lawyers Association.

.........................

On virtually every significant decision affecting election balloting since 2001, the division's Voting Rights Section has come down on the side of Republicans, notably in Florida, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Washington and other states where recent elections have been decided by narrow margins.

Joseph Rich, who left his job as chief of the section in 2005, said these events formed an unmistakable pattern. "As more information becomes available about the administration's priority on combating alleged, but not well substantiated, voter fraud, the more apparent it is that its actions concerning voter ID laws are part of a partisan strategy to suppress the votes of poor and minority citizens," he said.

more at:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationworld/bal-te.attorneys19apr19,0,94678.story?coll=bal-nationworld-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Welcome to the Banana Republic of the United States of America. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RubyDuby in GA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. I have repeatedly said that we need to get the Carter Center to monitor
our elections just like they do in other third world countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I heard they wouldn't do it even if asked
because we don't meet the minimum equipment and procedural requirements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. I believe all of the voter suppression restrictions are still in place
and will continue to be unless someone specifically changes them. The new SoS in Ohio is fighting to change the GOP bias in Ohio, but that is only one state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. One of the disturbing things is the aggressive hiring of non-political
appointees by... essentially political hirings. These folks are now part of the civil service for a long time.

When the next admin comes in - they can (and often do) change the political appointees - but what about the huge number of political hirings into the civil service ranks in the DOJ? I guess at best folks can be moved into less sensitive positions? Maybe these folks will be more interested in making money than a life of govt service and will leave on their own volition leaving room for folks interested in doing the job rather than making political decisions into policy?

What was striking in one of the articles about Goodling was the statement of how little concern she and those around her really cared about the actual business of the DOJ - as if the department (and the fed govt in general) - were considered not important... but waging political war - now that was the goal. So how many folks of that mold have been hired into the civil service ranks in the DOJ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. This DU thread should answer your question
So how many folks of that mold have been hired into the civil service ranks in the DOJ?

Apparently quite a few. According to the Buzzflash article, they were passing up applicants who had graduated summa cum laude from Harvard and Yale law schools in favor of people with the "right" credentials for entry-level positions.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=695912&mesg_id=695912

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Bush administration has turned the Justice Department into an arm of the RNC.
They have chosen to selectively enforce federal laws only when it suits their POLITICAL goals, even pursuing cases based upon trumped up charges, as long as it helps Republican candidates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. The fact is that the republicans are the minority but through ....
.... voter suppression, control of the media, vote manipulation, and
selective law enforcement "they" have gained control of "free elections."

In Ohio in 2004
*There were more dems registered than republicans
* new voter registration went 10 to 1 to dems
* more jobs were lost from 2000 - 2004 in Ohio than any other state
in the country and economic factors are the #1 predictor for voter behavior
* polls showed that independent voters broke for Kerry

And yet bush won?

The Department of Justice has become a branch of the RNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. So that those 'elected' Rs would carry on The Octopus funding scheme
Edited on Thu Apr-19-07 10:12 AM by EVDebs
"It's all part of a growing ongoing investigation into corruption in defense and intelligence contracts, which already has sent former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham to prison and, legal sources say, may threaten others in Congress and the CIA. "

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12634250/

The DOD's financing, which has resulted in a $2.3 TRILLION loss-production to the public's books, has ended up funding the RNC's designated candidates who will do what the MilitaryIndustrialCongressional Complex wants to do,

""According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions," Rumsfeld admitted.

$2.3 trillion — that's $8,000 for every man, woman and child in America. To understand how the Pentagon can lose track of trillions, consider the case of one military accountant who tried to find out what happened to a mere $300 million.

"We know it's gone. But we don't know what they spent it on," said Jim Minnery, Defense Finance and Accounting Service.""

War on Waste
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml

The GOP knows where that $ went. Front co's like MZM, Inc, etc etc etc

BTW, the computer systems outsourceing to Ptech was a stroke of genius, too, with WH, DOJ and most of the DOD

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptech


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. 's Ok - they vote in Iraq! Purple fingers and such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. And too many elected Democrats have sat silently watching this happen.
Where is their fury? Where is their blowback? Why aren't they screaming from the rooftops?

I've tried to convey a sense of urgency to my elected officials ... Not much ever happens. I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. Great post. McClatchy has been GREAT on this.
Edited on Thu Apr-19-07 10:42 AM by autorank

And it's been more than six years and it's involved a lot more people than the * gang.

See this study, which documents the whole thing:

See this classic study:

Ballot Manipulation and the "Menace of Negro Domination”: Racial Threat & Felon Disenfranchisement in the USA, 1850-2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
14. K AND R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. Great article. It's as though it's not who registers to vote,
it's whose votes register.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. impeachment, anyone? . . . if this doesn't qualify, I don't know what does . . .
of course, by now we have so many legitimate grounds for impeachment that it's hard to keep track . . . can't the Congress pick just one, or two, or ten, and get on with it? . . . don't they consider the BushCo criminal enterprise sufficient reason to impeach? . . . or are they just bound and determined not to upset the status quo that gets all of them re-elected so regularly? . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. Jim Crow is alive and well and
running our country. :puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelaque liberal Donating Member (981 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
19. Deserves wide readership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
20. Notonly "tried".. they succeeded. How can anyone really believe
that with the tone on '06, we got such a small gain?

GOP is ALL about suppression and chicanery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC