Kber
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:31 PM
Original message |
Opening Medicare to age 55+ may also stimulate the job market |
|
My 61 year old mother can afford to retire, but only if she can find health insurance at a reasonable rate. There may be others like her who are working for the health care only. When she retires, she will be replaced at her job.
Just a thought.
|
Schema Thing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I don't know if that effect will be large or small |
|
but it will happen to some extent, and that's a good thing.
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Two big details we wait for on tenterhooks - the age limit and the premium amount |
hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
3. FWIW - I posted a similar story elsewhere tonight. Two anecdotes are |
|
two anecdotes, but at some point it becomes an important consideration.
:hi:
|
tonysam
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The problem is "they" are proposing something like $200 a month |
|
for Medicare for younger people. This isn't acceptable if one is unemployed and can't get work because of age.
|
Kber
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. That's only one of many problems, to be sure |
|
I think you could stimulate the economy even more by opening Medicare up to everyone because you would have a bumper crop of entrepreneurs who could strike out on their own if they had access to affordable health care.
They'd both create new jobs, new businesses, some would hire employees, and most would leave openings at their old establishments for people to fill.
But then I don't run the zoo.
|
tonysam
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. I like the idea, don't get me wrong, but it would be hard to afford |
|
the premiums if you have no work. Self-employment takes money as well.
|
Kber
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
I was really just thinking about my Mother who has some decent savings and became eligible to receive a pension from the Rail Road last January. I think she could swing it, even paying $300 a month for premiums.
However, her husband isn't 55 yet and she carries her on her policy, so she might have to work another 3 years to retire afterall.
|
roamer65
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. Here is where I would support making private health insurance benefits taxable. |
|
To fund Medicare for everyone 55+ at no cost.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. It should be about $384/month. (That's the current rate.) |
|
The current Medicare premium charged to 65+ retirees on Social Security is about $96/month ... which is 25% of the cost, where the other 75% is paid by FICA/HI (that 1.5%) payroll taxes. That's a fair rate for someone 55+ and lower than available from private (for-profit) companies, I believe. For those who cannot affor $384/month, assistance is supposed to be made available.
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-09-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
19. It's good to see you back. |
|
I for one have missed you.
Lasher
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-09-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
23. Whenever I miss someone ... |
|
... I work to improve my aim. :dunce:
|
amandabeech
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-09-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
22. That's the basic Part B premium which covers doctor's visits, etc. |
|
Part A is hospitalization which is the most expensive component. That's where the bulk of the $850 monthly payment total is coming from.
|
dysfunctional press
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
16. $200/month would be a bargain price. |
|
i'd be shocked if it's as low as that.
|
democraticinsurgent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
this could be good news for me. I'm paying on the open market as a self employed/aka unemployed worker for my insurance and it's crappy for almost $300 a month. I would hope to a) be eligible for Medicare and b) that the medicare insurance would be better than Anthem.
|
roamer65
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:39 PM
Response to Original message |
6. If they do this, I will retire at 62. |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-08-09 09:41 PM by roamer65
Maybe work some putzy part-time job for extra money, but I will leave full time work.
|
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message |
10. depending on the tax rate it could be a huge win for business |
|
a business could offer supplemental plan and an employee would be fully covered.
i know it would be for my wife's employer
|
roamer65
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
I suspect business will offer to pay the entire Medicare premium and supplement for employees 55+.
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-09-09 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
Lots of people younger than 65 currently receive retiree medical benefits.
|
2Design
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:50 PM
Response to Original message |
11. actuallly it might make it better employment for older americans if companies |
|
don't have to cover their insurance - they will stop put older out of jobs
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 09:55 PM
Response to Original message |
14. And others will be able to get jobs because they are NOT needing insurance. |
|
All the people deemed uninsurable with pre-existing conditions may not be hireable because they won't be jacking up the corporation's health insurance rates.
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
17. I still won't retire until I'm 70 |
|
The benefits estimate I received from SS this year shows a nearly $500/month difference in monthly benefits between retiring at 70 vs 66.
Besides, we don't know the details of this plan - it may still be necessary to buy a medigap supplement and then there's Medicare D costs.
|
backscatter712
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message |
18. If small businesses were even partly relieved of health care expenses... |
|
That would do awesome things for the economy. Small businesses are getting their asses kicked by health care costs, and if this bill helps with that, we'll see a definite boost!
|
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-09-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message |
21. This who medicare thing is really a big win for the democrats |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 11:32 AM
Response to Original message |