Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Department cited for contempt of court for not taping Gitmo testimony

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 06:51 PM
Original message
Justice Department cited for contempt of court for not taping Gitmo testimony
A federal district court judge ruled on Thursday that the Department of Justice was in contempt of court when it failed to videotape a Guantanamo detainee's testimony last summer.

Mohammed al-Adahi, accused of belonging to a terrorist organization, had challenged his detention at Guantanamo Bay in front of Judge Gladys Kessler. In June, Kessler ordered the Justice Department to videotape al-Adahi's tesimony for the court from the Guantanamo prison camp, edit out any classified information and hand the tape over to the court.

After al-Adahi's testimony, the government informed the court that, due to "miscommunication," it had not videotaped the testimony. On Thursday Judge Kessler cited the department for contempt of court, reports the Washington Post.

Kessler ruled in August that the US government hadn't proven its case against al-Adahi and ordered him released. The federal government quickly appealed that decision, and al-Adahi remains in Guantanamo.

"The purpose of the Court’s Order requiring the Government to videotape Petitioner’s testimony was to ensure the maximum amount of public accessibility to the judicial process," Judge Kessler wrote in her ruling (PDF). "Thus, there are two other justifications for imposing sanctions against the Government: to minimize the damages to the public’s lost opportunity to observe an actual Guantanamo Bay trial ... and to deter further noncompliance with court orders."


Link
http://rawstory.com/2009/12/justice-department-contempt/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Miscommunication is not a justifiable defense for the Justice Dept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC