Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Recession over? Yes or No?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Synicus Maximus Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 09:59 PM
Original message
Recession over? Yes or No?
Source: AP and AFP

Two seemingly different statements from two White House aids.

Its Over

WASHINGTON – The top White House economic adviser says "everybody agrees the recession is over" even though many experts predict unemployment could climb higher.
Larry Summers says key indicators have shown that the economy is beginning to expand again and that job creation probably will follow. The jobless rate stands at 10 percent.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=post&forum=102&go_ahead=doit

Its not over.
WASHINGTON (AFP) – President Barack Obama's top economic aide Christina Romer said Sunday that the improving US economy is not yet out of recession, and will not turn the corner until the unemployment picture improves.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091213/bs_afp/useconomyunemploymentrecession_20091213152716

I'm confused.

Read more: http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/search?ei=UTF-8&c=&p=recession
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. This admin is a
cluster fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. Yes it is. If unemplyment is still rising higher then the recession isn't over.
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 10:57 PM by ThomCat
:grr:

I don't care what their pretty charts say, or if the corporations are doing well. For the vast majority of people, you know, citizens, the ones they should be concerned about, the recession is still getting worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. The definition of "recession" is based on pretty charts.
It's quite possible to not be in a recession and still have godawful unemployment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. No shit. I know that.
Economists define everything based on pretty charts and indicators that have nothing to do with the realities that people in the lower tax brackets face. But that doesn't mean that the realities down here in the lower tax brackets aren't real too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. It also doesn't have anything to do with whether we're in a recession. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Fine, go back to your economic journals where only the
world of the rich exists. :eyes:

We really don't need that shitty attitude here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Are you seriously suggesting that economists...
...should simply give up on trying to understand whether the economy is expanding or contracting? Whether or not the economy is expanding or contracting is simply one of a plethora of tools used by economists to try to understand the state of the economy. Like unemployment figures. And GDP. And CPI. But I guess reading angry posts on internet discussion forums is a far more precise economic tool in your world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. No, I'm saying in discussions Here
we don't need to limit ourselves to only what the economists definitions are. We are allowed to be concerned about real people

If you can't be bothered to be concerned about real people because the official definition only deals with bigger numbers then go talk someplace else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. This has nothing to do with my concern or lack of concern for "real people."
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 02:29 AM by Cessna Invesco Palin
Whether the recession is over or not over is an entirely separate issue. The recession could be over, and we would be in the midst of what's termed a "jobless recovery," which is not very good for "real people." But that doesn't mean that we should stop analyzing the economy in statistical terms just because you don't like what the numbers say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Are you sure you know you're on DU? Seems like Free Rep is where you belong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. This administration does often resemble a cluster fuck,
sometimes even fubar. You gonna call me a freeper? Name calling is the refuge of small minded scoundrels. I just stole that from one of our founding fathers. I think it was Ben Franklin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. "Name calling is the refuge of goddamned fuckfaces"- Bukowski
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Oh knock it off.
DU does not require a loyalty oath to the president just because he's a democrat. We don't act like republicans like that.

We support the party as a whole, not any one person in the party. We are free to critique the president if he's fucking up.

If you think that everyone should be marching in lockstep, cheering the president simply because he's the president then perhaps you are the one in the wrong place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Up is the new down, but down is still the old down.
Or something. Jeeze, those guys need to get their story straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldstein1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's best just not to ask
The truth is a very complicated thing, so they just flip a coin before each press conference. Heads--the cup is half full; Tails--the cup is half empty.

I guess the Ministry of Truth couldn't keep up with the changes.

Ignorance is Strength.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ask next year after the holidays and the next quarterly report.
As someone looking for a job, now is NOT the time to find anything. Lots of orgs. are doing end-of-the-year stuff, and hiring isn't at the top of their hit parade. Plus, no one wants to pay for holidays off for newbies.

I hope there will be some sunshine early next year for many people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. You're too valuable
to stay out of work for long. Good luck.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Aw jeeze, from your lips...
:hug: Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dear God - Even This Gets Unrec-ed
Anything that doesn't involve the purist adulation of the Obama administration gets savaged these days...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. +1
It used to be contained to GD:STFU, but it's been spilling over here lately

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
39. welcome to undemocratic underground!!
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 01:46 AM by flyarm
ve shall not let zee truth be known!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Things are getting better . the corporate media is not
allowed to say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Extremely weak recovery
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 10:23 PM by JVS
Technically, since GDP going up, the recession is over. On the other hand the growth in GDP includes government expenditures and most of the GDP gain can be traced to growth in those expenditures, one can infer that the other segments that make up GDP are flat or possibly declining, so it's very weak. Next quarter could be better or worse, and it could turn into negative growth again, becoming a double dip.


Now here is where political positioning starts making things complex. If the administration wants to take credit for being in growth (even if weakly) now, then avoiding blame if it goes into the second dip is difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Recession..
... is a technical term referring to the behavior of certain economic statistics.

These statistics are sometime meaningful, sometimes not, sometimes accurate, sometimes "adjusted" beyond recognition.

At some point we will be "technically" out of recession but nothing much will change for working Americans. The politicians and the media will focus on these technical indicators as meaningful when there are in fact not particularly.

To summarize, we are technically near the end of the "recession" but as a practical matter we are actually IN a depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Most of us are still going through it. It will be over when my family quits feeling it.
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 10:25 PM by superconnected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. Repeat after me.
There is no such thing as a jobless recovery.

The first advisor is a banking advisor, and for banks and offshore corporations and the top 3%, the recession is over. For the rest of the world, it's not.

There's nothing to be confused about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. World's First Evah Jobless Recovery!
We're #1 !!!111

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Actually, Dim Son's Was Also (At Least Close To) Jobless nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #12
41. There is no such thing as a jobless recovery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. No jobs, no recovery. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. Define recession.
It's that simple - the up-till-jobless-recovery way of measurement was GDP growth. By that measure, we're out of the recession. If we want to change that definition to 'job growth', then we are not yet out of the recession.

Funny thing? Every single poster here knows this, so your post and everybody calling the administration a 'cluster-fuck' are being deliberately antagonistic and are simply looking for a fight. Pretty silly if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:52 PM
Original message
I want to see how Obama's meeting with the bankers goes. I hope he reads them
the riot act. I want him to put the fear of God in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. He seemed genuinely pissed at them during his 60 minutes interview
he should force harsh regulations on them if they don't snap the &^&^out of it :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #26
35. He needs to go "medieval on them." They need a little public humiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. Technically, yes. In human terms, no.
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 10:36 PM by roamer65
The 3rd quarter posted GDP growth, therefore it was technically the end of the recession. In human terms, we are far from the end of economic troubles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. No, the ones saying yes are trying to get people to spend their money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. Looking at the technicals, yes.
In all practicality for the everyday man in the street, the answer is no.

Until people see that there are new jobs, wage growth, a bottoming of the decline in housing values, they won't fell secure enough to spend money and support any economic recovery.

An 'L' shaped recovery when it comes to jobs is no real recovery for Main Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kind of hard to improve unemployment when...
You keep exporting jobs and importing more shit from China. Oh shit, now the service economy is hurting too. Gee, who would have thought? And the people running this country think they are so intelligent and know so much more than the peons.

But hey, at least those fuckers in Washington have their guaranteed lifetime pension and health care to go with the board seat and/or lobbyist gig they have waiting on them. Because that's what really counts with what makes this country great... For them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. Nope, not over yet.
I will let you all know when I have a job. Then it will officially be over. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. The dipshit who said "everybody agrees the recession is over" is probably pulling down close to
a quarter million a year at taxpayer expense. Probably has great bennies, too.

Kinda changes your perspective on the status of the depression. (I saw Paul Krugman refer to it as a depression in a commentary. No recession--we're talking depression. Not as great as the Great Depression, but a depression no less).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
30. The economy is no longer nose-diving, but that's far from recovered.
When the unemployment level goes down to 4% or so, THAT'S when I consider the recession to be over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
38. it's not over till people who lost jobs get equal jobs back! A recession is a recession if you
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 01:43 AM by flyarm
can't pay your bills, buy food for your family, can't pay your rent or mortgage, and don't have a freaking job!

anyone can fuck with numbers and the books!..they have throughout history!

Tell the guy or gal losing their home or job..the recession is over..or come here to Fla where businesses are still closing daily and unemployment is over 10%!!!!!!!!!! and that is just what is being reported..those numbers are jaded downward!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. Some think it is just the math. I agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC