Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Single Payer Also Bad Because It May Result In Going To Prison Due To Taxes?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:58 PM
Original message
Is Single Payer Also Bad Because It May Result In Going To Prison Due To Taxes?
I understand one of the arguments is that if you don't purchase health insurance, you get a tax, and if you don't pay that tax, you could theoretically get prosecuted for not paying taxes. There is nothing in the health care bill that actually imposes a prison sentence, and in fact there is language in some versions that specifically prohibit prison for failing to pay that tax. However, lets assume that you could go to prison for not paying taxes.

My question is whether this is also a reason to oppose single payer, which would largely be taxpayer funded. If, instead of premiums or deductibles, we pay taxes, and I refuse to pay my taxes, don't I still go to prison?

What I don't understand is folks using the prison talking point, then demanding single payer, which is even more dependent on taxes than the bills being considered.

Taxes may go up under single payer, BUT total costs should go down, since we are not paying premiums and co-pays. However, if the possibility of prison for not paying taxes is a deal breaker, then isn't single payer a bad idea according to that logic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glen123098 Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Theres a big difference between single payer and this bill.
Single Payer systems generally have a progressive tax system, while fining people who can't afford healthcare is regressive. Thats why I support Single Payer and oppose this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I Agree, But If Prison Due To Taxes Is A Deal Breaker, Isn't Single Payer Worse?
I personally support single payer, but the talking point I see is the Fox News yelling point that this bill will send you to prisom, because you may not pay taxes. I don't see the relationship, but if we accept this talking point, doesn't it apply with even more force to single payer?

I support single payer, but it is not because I am afraid that the current bill will result in me or someone else going to prison for not paying their taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The Mandate takes your money which you earned to preserve your life & AWARDS it to a parasite
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 10:06 PM by kenny blankenship
with no choice for you. Pay the Cartel whatever they demand or else THEN you have the govt. to worry about too - TAX PENALTY, HEARINGS, LAWYERS, MAYBE JAIL.

Go fuck yourself with your mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Oddly,That's The Same Argument Used By Right to Lifers...
Why should their taxes be used to pay for insurance that can also be used to pay for abortions? Likewise, what about paying for a gas excise tax, which used to promote alternative energy. What if you do not believe in global warming?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. If their objection was that the money meant to provide abortions was used to buy vacation homes
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 10:19 PM by kenny blankenship
for insurance execs instead of providing a legal medical service, then maybe they'd have a point and maybe your comparison would be worth discussing.

But as it happens that's not what they say, and you are just as full of shit as they are. Why don't you content yourself with misrepresenting just one side of one argument-yours- instead of hopping around and dragging in others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. So, what if the single payer tax paid for a ...
...medical device that some foreign company was manufacturing at a much cheaper cost than a domestic company? According to your line of argument, the fact that somewhere in the money chain, that dollar is used for a purpose we disagree with, is a reason for opposing the use of taxes to fund health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. Taxes pay for the DMV but people who don't pay taxes don't go to prison when they pay a ticket.
Single-payer would be no different than paying for a war or the highway system. How would using it note that you're not paying your taxes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Single Payer would be done through payroll taxes
with matching employer taxes like FICA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Which You Still Could Mis-report, Also If An Independent Contractor...
Then you would need to report income and pay taxes, perhaps through a 1099. Now, if you refuse to pay the taxes attributable to single payer, you are in the same pickle of possibly going to prison due to refusal to pay taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. What is your point exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. having roads and a fire dept. would be a bad idea under that argument
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 10:07 PM by pitohui
look, if you look hard enough, then everything leads to everything, i guess

if i can't pay my taxes and i lose my house and then i'm caught sleeping illegally in a park and get put in jail then is it the fault of the fire dept. who decided to raise the taxes on my house that started the whole shitball sequence of events?

if taxes are too high, and people can't pay, i don't see how that's the fault of health care -- it's the fault of years of deficits created by one george w. bush...

the whole booyah, we're gonna put people in jail to pay for health care is just scare tactics anyway, why do we humor liars? i think we make a mistake when we pretend that obvious astro-turfers are really "concerned citizens," it's time to call bullshit what it is

"the house of sand and fog" was a movie, not a description
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Some people can't understand the difference between a tax funded social service like the road dept..
And forcing people to, single-handedly as individuals, to pay for a specific section of a road all by themselves at market rates.

Its incomparable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Let's see...a tax that pays for me to actually get health care?
Or a fine for not giving 27% of my income to a criminal organization that will still see me pay $10,000 out of my own pocket in a year with a semi-serious illness? Hmmm

Oh, fiddle dee dee...I'll think about that tomorrow....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. So, You Are Cool If The Proceeds Of The Tax...
Are used to pay for subsidies to lower income folks to purchase health care insurance. I'm cool with that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. yep nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Do we get to vote on the board memberships of the insurance companies
who will be spending our mandated premiums and tax penalties?

Didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. With single payer, payroll taxes are raised slightly
and the income tax is greatly increased on the wealthiest as well as market speculators.

You have to pay a modest fee for every service/prescription you take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. I would gladly pay taxes for a government administered public
program that was universal in scope.

But I'm not really into making sure that insurance people can have private jets and tropical junkets on my health care dime.

That's pretty much how I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC